期刊文献+

Formability analysis of dissimilar tailor welded blanks welded with different tool pin profiles 被引量:1

不同形状搅拌头焊接异种拼焊板的成形性分析(英文)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 An attempt has been made to study the tailor welded blanks (TWBs) made by friction stir welding (FSW) with five different tool pin profiles. The formability of welded blanks was evaluated at constant FSW process parameters. It has been found that the welded blanks with square pin profile tool produced better formability properties as compared to other tool pin profiles. It was found that the pulsating action of the square pin profile is said to be the reason for this improvement. A microstructural evaluation performed on the blanks revealed that the stir zone created by taper cylindrical and stepped cylindrical tools was less homogeneous than that of the square tool, resulting in less formability. The limiting dome height (LDH) of square pin profile tool was found to be 14 mm while those of taper cylindrical and stepped cylindrical tools are 12.5 mm and 12.4 mm, respectively. 研究采用5种形状搅拌头搅拌摩擦焊接拼焊板。在相同搅拌摩擦焊工艺参数下研究了拼焊板的成形性。研究结果表明,与其他形状搅拌头相比,方形搅拌头制备的拼焊板具有更好的成形性,这是由于方形搅拌头具有搏动效应。显微组织研究表明,与方形搅拌头相比,锥形和阶梯圆柱状搅拌头焊接板材的搅拌区组织更不均匀,导致成形性较差。方形搅拌头的极限顶高为14 mm,而锥形和阶梯圆柱状搅拌的极限顶高分别为12.5 mm和12.4 mm。
出处 《Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2015年第6期1787-1793,共7页 中国有色金属学报(英文版)
基金 financial support under the SERC scheme (SR/S3/MERC0110/2009 dated July 30,2010) to Dr M J DAVIDSON
关键词 aluminium alloys tool pin profile tensile testing FORMABILITY microstructure 铝合金 搅拌头形状 拉伸试验 成形性 显微组织
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献23

  • 1LIU H J, FUJII H, MAEDAA M, NOGI K. Tensile properties and fracture locations of friction-stir-welded joints of 2017-T351 aluminum alloy [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2003, 142: 692-696.
  • 2LAKSHMINARAYANAN A K, BALASUBRAMANIAN V, ELANGOVAN K. Effect of welding processes on tensile properties of AA6061 aluminium alloy joints [J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2008 (Available online). DOI: 10.1007/s00170-007-1325-0.
  • 3GRUM J, SLABE J M. The use of factorial design and response surface methodology for fast determination of optimal heat treatment conditions of different Ni-Co-Mo surfaced layers [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2004, 155:2026 2032.
  • 4GUNARAJ V, MURUGAN N. Application of response surface methodology for predicting weld bead quality in submerged arc welding of pipes [J]. Journal of Material Processing Technology, 1999, 88: 266-275.
  • 5MANONMANI K, MURUGAN N, BUVANASEKARAN G. Effect of process parameters on the weld bead geometry of laser beam welded stainless steel sheets [J]. Int J Joining Mater, 2005, 17(4): 103-109.
  • 6BALASUBRAMANIAN M, JAYABALAN V, BALASUBRAMANIAN V. Developing mathematical models to predict tensile properties of pulsed current gas tungsten arc welded Ti-6Al-4V alloy [J]. Materials and Design, 2008, 29(1): 92-97.
  • 7PALANI P K, MURUGAN N. Optimization of weld bead geometry for stainless steel claddings deposited by FCAW [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2007, 190:291-299.
  • 8DUTTA E PRATIHAR D K. Modeling of TIG welding process using conventional regression analysis and neural network-based approaches [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2007, 184: 56-68.
  • 9ATES H. Prediction of gas metal arc welding parameters based on artificial neural networks [J]. Materials and Design, 2007, 28: 2015 2023.
  • 10OKUYUCU H, KURT A, ARCAKLIOGLU E. Artificial neural network application to the friction stir welding of aluminum plates [J]. Materials and Design, 2007, 28(1): 78-84.

共引文献15

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部