摘要
《荀子》一书既有性恶的说法,也有性朴的说法。很多论者不注意后一种说法,而在注意到它的人之中,甚少有人认为它与性恶的说法是冲突的。日本学者兒玉六郎别出心裁地以性朴论来解释《性恶》,而国内也有个别学者倾向于提出类似的解释。事实上,性朴与性恶是无法协调的。《性恶》无性朴的意思。我们在客观理解儒家人性论时要摆脱不正确的先入为主。荀子和董仲舒是性朴论的代表,而众多从王充开始先入为主的说法让人们不容易接受这一点。平心静气地读他们的原著,则可以发现以性恶论来说荀子,以情性阴阳论来说董仲舒是大有问题的。王充对董仲舒人性论的叙述难以在他的著作中获得支持。
As for the discourses on human nature in Xurazi, there are two arguments on human nature, one stating that man＇s nature is evil, another stating that it is simple and uncarved. However, the second argument has been ignored, and for those who have noticed it, few consider that it conflicts with the first one. Rokuro Kodama, a Japanese scholar, creatively uses the second argument to study the chapter of Xunzi, ＂Man＇s Nature is Evil＂. Some Chinese scholars take this view. In fact, these two arguments on human nature are irreconcilable. Understanding Confucian theory of human nature, we should try to get rid of stereotypes. Besides, Xunzi and Dong Zhongshu are early two representatives of the doctrine of human nature as simple and uncarved, which has been hidden by the sayings from Wang Chong. With careful and peaceful reading of their works, we can find that it is questionable to label Xunzi a representative of the doctrine that human nature is originally evil, to label Dong Zhongshu a representative of the doctrine that man＇s original nature is good and man＇s feeling is evil. There is not evidence to support Wang Chong＇s ideas of Dong Zhongshu＇s theory of human nature.
出处
《社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第8期116-122,共7页
Journal of Social Sciences
关键词
荀子
董舒舒
性朴论
性恶论
Xunzi
Dong Zhongshu
Man＇s Original Nature as Simple and Uncarved
Man＇s Original Nature as Evil
