摘要
学术期刊要不要评价,应该由谁来评价,又该如何评价,是近年来经常为学术界、期刊界乃至科研管理者不断讨论的热点话题。通过调查问卷发现:学术界、期刊界和科研管理部门对"学术期刊需要评价"持肯定的态度,而且大部分人认为学术期刊评价不会阻碍学术的繁荣和发展;虽然学术共同体回归学术期刊评价主体的呼声很大,但大部分人认为学术共同体为学术期刊评价主体会遇到障碍,专业学术期刊评价机构仍是各界首选的评价主体;"定量为主,定性为辅"是学术界、期刊界和科研管理部门首选的学术期刊评价方法,学术期刊评价内容应是"影响因子等定量指标"和"学术质量、政治质量、编辑质量、出版质量等定性指标"相结合的呼声最大。为提高学术期刊评价水平,应建立官方的学术期刊评价机制;构建专业评价机构与学术共同体相结合的评价主体;完善"定性"评价指标,评价内容应体现"学术"和"期刊"两方面。
Whether academic journals should be evaluated, who should evaluate and how to evaluate etc. is often a hot topic in academic circles, journals and scientific research management in recent years. The questionnaire studies show that academic circles, journals and scientific management departments have a positive attitude that academic journals need to be evaluated and most people think that the academic journal evaluation will not hinder the academic prosperity and development. Although the appeal is great for academic community to return to the evaluation subject of academic journals, most people think that there will be obstacle if academic community will be the evaluation subject of academic journals, and professional academic journal evaluation institution is still the first choice of evaluation subject. Quantitative analysis supplemented with qualitative analysis is the first choice of academic journal evaluation method for academic circles, journals and scientific research management departments. The loudest voice in the evaluation content of academic journals is combination of quantitative index of influence factors etc. and qualitative index of academic quality, political quality, editing quality and publishing quality etc. In order to improve the evaluation level of academic journals,relevant people should establish the evaluation mechanism of the academic journals, construct the evaluation subject of the combination of professional evaluation organizations and academic community, improve qualitative evaluation index, and reflect the two aspects of academy and journals in evaluation contents.
出处
《四川理工学院学报（社会科学版）》
2015年第3期76-81,共6页
Journal of Sichuan University of Science & Engineering(Social Sciences Edition)
基金
中共福建省委党校福建行政学院2015年院级科研项目(2015B02)
关键词
学术期刊
期刊评价
核心期刊
学术共同体
定量评价
academic journal
journal evaluation
core journal
academic community
quantitative evaluation
