期刊文献+

对比不同类型心肌灌注结合CTCA判断冠状动脉狭窄准确率 被引量:6

The Difference between CTA and Different Types of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Combined with CTA in the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Stenosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同类型心肌灌注结合CT冠状动脉造影(CTCA)判断冠状动脉狭窄准确率的价值。方法对80例临床怀疑冠心病患者行64排CTCA及冠状动脉造影(CAG)检查,其中28例行腺苷负荷下多排螺旋CT心肌灌注成像检查(MSCTP),以CAG为"金标准",计算并对比CTCA与CTCA结合各种MSCTP诊断冠状动脉狭窄准确率。结果 CTCA结合各组心肌灌注判断冠状动脉狭窄准确率均高于单独CTCA(76.3%)检查,而心肌首过灌注组准确率(80.0%)与静息下心肌灌注组(82.1%)相近,腺苷负荷组(89.3%)准确率最高。结论 CTCA结合不同的心肌灌注可以不同程度的提高冠状动脉狭窄准确率。 Objective To assess the difference between computed tomography coronary angiography(CTCA) and different types of multislice spiral computed tomography perfusion imaging(MSCTP) combined with CTCA in the diagnosis of coronary artery stenosis. Methods A total of 80 cases of clinical suspected coronary heart disease patients were included in this study, CTCA and cornary angioiography(CAG) were performed in all patients. Of the 28 accepted multislice spiral computed tomography perfusion imaging(MSCTP) under adenosine stress. The diagnostic accuracy of variours MSCTP myocardial imaging were compared with the CTCA, and CAG were regarded as the "gold standard". Results The accuracy rate of CTCA combined MSCTP were higher than individual CTCA(76.3%) examination, while MSCTP under adenosine stress(89.3%) were higher than the first-pass myocardial perfusion group(80.0%),which similar to resting myocardial perfusion group(82.1%). Conclusion Combined CTCA with MSCTP improve the diagnostic accuracy in coronary artery stenosis.
出处 《中国CT和MRI杂志》 2015年第8期54-56,93,共4页 Chinese Journal of CT and MRI
基金 广东省社会发展领域科技计划项目(20120318029) 广州市医学重点学科资助项目(项目编号:穗卫科[2013]21号)
关键词 多层螺旋CT 冠状动脉血管造影术 心肌灌注 冠状动脉狭窄 MSCT Coronary Angiography Myocardial Perfusion Coronary Stenosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献75

共引文献267

同被引文献63

引证文献6

二级引证文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部