期刊文献+

Anterior rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: Technical and functional results 被引量:8

Anterior rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: Technical and functional results
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM:To assess effectiveness, complications, recurrence rate, and recent improvements of the anterior rectopexy procedure for treatment of total rectal prolapse.METHODS:MEDLINE, Pub Med, EMBASE, and other relevant database were searched to identify studies.Randomized controlled trials, non-randomized studies and original articles in English language, with more than 10 patients who underwent laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse, with a follow-up over 3 mo were considered for the review.RESULTS:Twelve non-randomized case series studies with 574 patients were included in the review.No surgical mortality was described.Conversion was needed in 17 cases(2.9%), most often due to difficult adhesiolysis.Twenty eight patients(4.8%) presented with major complications.Seven(1.2%) mesh-related complications were reported.Most frequent complications were urinary tract infection and urinary retention.Mean recurrence rate was 4.7% with a median follow-up of 23 mo.Improvement of constipation ranged from 3%-72% of the patients and worsening or new onset occurred in 0%-20%.Incontinence improved in 31%-84% patients who presented fecal incontinence at various stages.Evaluation of functional score was disparate between studies.CONCLUSION:Based on the low long-term recurrence rate and favorable outcome data in terms of low de novo constipation rate, improvement of anal incontinence, and low complications rate, laparoscopic anterior rectopexy seems to emerge as an efficient procedure for the treatment of patients with total rectal prolapse. AIM:To assess effectiveness, complications, recurrence rate, and recent improvements of the anterior rectopexy procedure for treatment of total rectal prolapse.METHODS:MEDLINE, Pub Med, EMBASE, and other relevant database were searched to identify studies.Randomized controlled trials, non-randomized studies and original articles in English language, with more than 10 patients who underwent laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse, with a follow-up over 3 mo were considered for the review.RESULTS:Twelve non-randomized case series studies with 574 patients were included in the review.No surgical mortality was described.Conversion was needed in 17 cases(2.9%), most often due to difficult adhesiolysis.Twenty eight patients(4.8%) presented with major complications.Seven(1.2%) mesh-related complications were reported.Most frequent complications were urinary tract infection and urinary retention.Mean recurrence rate was 4.7% with a median follow-up of 23 mo.Improvement of constipation ranged from 3%-72% of the patients and worsening or new onset occurred in 0%-20%.Incontinence improved in 31%-84% patients who presented fecal incontinence at various stages.Evaluation of functional score was disparate between studies.CONCLUSION:Based on the low long-term recurrence rate and favorable outcome data in terms of low de novo constipation rate, improvement of anal incontinence, and low complications rate, laparoscopic anterior rectopexy seems to emerge as an efficient procedure for the treatment of patients with total rectal prolapse.
机构地区 Colorectal Unit
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2015年第16期5049-5055,共7页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 Total RECTAL PROLAPSE LAPAROSCOPY Anteriorrectopexy VENTRAL RECTOPEXY Results Recurrence Systematic review Total rectal prolapse Laparoscopy Anterior rectopexy Ventral rectopexy Results Recurrence Systematic review
  • 相关文献

参考文献46

  • 1Jones OM, Cunningham C, Lindsey I. The assessment andmanagement of rectal prolapse, rectal intussusception, rectocoele,and enterocoele in adults. BMJ 2011; 342: c7099 [PMID:21285185 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c7099].
  • 2Varma M, Rafferty J, Buie WD. Practice parameters forthe management of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum2011; 54: 1339-1346 [PMID: 21979176 DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182310f75].
  • 3Abbott D, Atere-Roberts N, Williams A, Oteng-Ntim E, ChappellLC. Obstetric anal sphincter injury. BMJ 2010; 341: c3414 [PMID:20621967 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c3414].
  • 4Tou S, Brown SR, Malik AI, Nelson RL. Surgery for completerectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (4):CD001758 [PMID: 18843623].
  • 5Jarry J, Peycru T, Shekher M, Faucheron JL. An uncommonsurgical disease. JAMA Surg 2014; 149: 395-396 [PMID: 24577506DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.808].
  • 6Madoff RD, Mellgren A. One hundred years of rectal prolapsesurgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 441-450 [PMID: 10215042DOI: 10.1007/BF02234164].
  • 7Lieberth M, Kondylis LA, Reilly JC, Kondylis PD. The Delormerepair for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a retrospective review.Am J Surg 2009; 197: 418-423 [PMID: 19245926 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.11.012].
  • 8Altemeier WA, Culbertson WR, Schowengerdt C, Hunt J.Nineteen years' experience with the one-stage perineal repair ofrectal prolapse. Ann Surg 1971; 173: 993-1006 [PMID: 5578808DOI: 10.1097/00000658-197106010-00018].
  • 9Schiedeck TH, Schwandner O, Scheele J, Farke S, Bruch HP.Rectal prolapse: which surgical option is appropriate- LangenbecksArch Surg 2005; 390: 8-14 [PMID: 15004753 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-004-0459-x].
  • 10Loygue J, Nordlinger B, Cunci O, Malafosse M, Huguet C, Parc R.Rectopexy to the promontory for the treatment of rectal prolapse.Report of 257 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 1984; 27: 356-359 [PMID:6376001 DOI: 10.1007/BF02552998].

同被引文献29

引证文献8

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部