期刊文献+

基于CAESAR Ⅱ的管土作用模型对比

Comparison of Pipe-soil Interaction Model Base on CAESAR Ⅱ
下载PDF
导出
摘要 埋地管道应力分析的关键是模拟管道与土壤的相互作用。基于CAESAR II内置的由Liang-Chuan(L.C.)Peng和American Lifelines Alliance提出的土弹簧模型,阐述了两种土弹簧模型的理论基础,在此基础上分析了两种土弹簧模型的优缺点和适用性;对比了管径、土壤密度、内摩擦角、管道埋深、管道壁厚对两种土弹簧模型的影响。对于土弹簧的选用给出了科学的建议,对于开展埋地管道应力分析工作具有积极作用。 The key factor of buried pipe stress analysis is to simulate pipe-soil interaction. Based on soil spring models presented by Liang-Chuan (L.C.) Peng and American Lifelines Alliance built in CAESAR II, theoretical basis of both soil spring models were introduced. Their advantages, disadvantages and applicability were studied. In the study, effect of the pipe size, soil density, internal friction angle, buried depth of the pipe and pipe wall thickness on the soil spring models was investigated; as a result the suggestion on soil spring model selection was proposed.
作者 冯金赢
出处 《辽宁化工》 CAS 2015年第7期887-890,914,共5页 Liaoning Chemical Industry
关键词 埋地管道 应力 CAESAR II 管土相互作用 土弹簧 buried pipe stress CAESAR II pipe-soil interaction soil spring
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1杜明俊,马贵阳,张春生,姜永明.多年冻土区埋地管道周围土壤温度场数值模拟[J].油气田地面工程,2010,29(10):12-14. 被引量:6
  • 2国家建设部.GB50251-2003输气管道工程设计规范[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2005.
  • 3刘仕鳌,蒲红宇,刘书文,蒋洪.埋地管道应力分析方法[J].油气储运,2012,31(4):274-278. 被引量:38
  • 4American Lifelines Alliance-ASCE. Guidelines for the design of buried steel pipe (with addenda through February 2005) [S]. New York: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2005.
  • 5北京艾思弗软件技术有限公司.管道应力分析理论指南[M].北京:COADEInc中国技术服务与培训中心,1998:193-202.
  • 6Liang-Chuan (L.C.) Peng. Stress Analysis Methods for Underground Pipelines. Pipeline Industry, 1978.

二级参考文献20

共引文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部