期刊文献+

Current status of laparoendoscopic rendezvous in the treatment of cholelithiasis with concomitant choledocholithiasis 被引量:10

Current status of laparoendoscopic rendezvous in the treatment of cholelithiasis with concomitant choledocholithiasis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The current evidence in favor of the laparoendoscopic rendezvous is promising and demonstrates the main advantages of this technique in regard to shorter hospital stay and selective cannulation of the commonbile duct(CBD), avoiding thus the inadvertent cannulation of the pancreatic duct. In addition, in the rendezvous technique the contrast medium is not injected retrogradely as during the traditional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP), when the medium accidentally could be injected under pressure into the pancreatic duct. The RV technique minimizes that risk. Both these main advantages of the RV technique over the classic ERCP, are related with a significant lower incidence of hyperamylasemia and post-ERCP pancreatitis, compared with the traditional two stage procedure. Choledocholithiasis is present in 10% to 15% of patients undergoing cholecystectomy. To date, the ideal management of CBD stones remains controversial. Prospective randomized trials have shown that laparoscopic management of the CBD stones, as a single stage procedure, is the most efficient and cost effective method of treatment. Laparoendoscopic rendezvous has been proposed as an alternative single stage approach. Several studies have shown the effective use of this technique in the treatment of CBD stones by improving patient compliance and clinical results including shorter hospital stay, higher success rate and less cost. The current evidence about the use of this technique presented in this review article is promising and demonstrates the main advantages of the procedure. The current evidence in favor of the laparoendoscopicrendezvous is promising and demonstrates the mainadvantages of this technique in regard to shorterhospital stay and selective cannulation of the commonbile duct (CBD), avoiding thus the inadvertent cannulationof the pancreatic duct. In addition, in therendezvous technique the contrast medium is notinjected retrogradelyas during the traditional endoscopicretrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), whenthe medium accidentally could be injected underpressure into the pancreatic duct. The RV techniqueminimizes that risk. Both these main advantages of theRV technique over the classic ERCP, are related witha significant lower incidence of hyperamylasemia andpost-ERCP pancreatitis, compared with the traditionaltwo stage procedure. Choledocholithiasis is present in10% to 15% of patients undergoing cholecystectomy.To date, the ideal management of CBD stones remainscontroversial. Prospective randomized trials have shownthat laparoscopic management of the CBD stones,as a single stage procedure, is the most efficient andcost effective method of treatment. Laparoendoscopicrendezvous has been proposed as an alternativesingle stage approach. Several studies have shown theeffective use of this technique in the treatment of CBDstones by improving patient complianceand clinicalresults including shorter hospital stay, higher successrate and less cost. The current evidence about theuse of this technique presented in this review article ispromising and demonstrates the main advantages of theprocedure.
机构地区 Department of Surgery
出处 《World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy》 CAS 2015年第7期714-719,共6页 世界胃肠内镜杂志(英文版)(电子版)
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Lella F, Bagnolo F, Rebuffat C, Scalambra M, Bonassi U, ColomboE. Use of the laparoscopic-endoscopic approach, the so-called“rendezvous” technique, in cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a validmethod in cases with patient-related risk factors for post-ERCPpancreatitis. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 419-423 [PMID: 16424987].
  • 2Rosenthal RJ, Rossi RL, Martin RF. Options and strategies forthe management of choledocholithiasis. World J Surg 1998; 22:1125-1132 [PMID: 9828720].
  • 3Targarona EM, Bendahan GE. Management of common bile ductstones: controversies and future perspectives. HPB (Oxford) 2004; 6:140-143 [PMID: 18333067].
  • 4Tranter SE, Thompson MH. Comparison of endoscopicsphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bileduct. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 1495-1504 [PMID: 12445057].
  • 5Basso N, Pizzuto G, Surgo D, Materia A, Silecchia G, Fantini A, Fiocca F, Trentino P. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy andintraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in the treatment ofcholecysto-choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50:532-535 [PMID: 10502176].
  • 6Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL, Fossard DP. Prospectiverandomised study of preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomyversus surgery alone for common bile duct stones. Br Med J (ClinRes Ed) 1987; 294: 470-474 [PMID: 3103731].
  • 7Stain SC, Cohen H, Tsuishoysha M, Donovan AJ. Choledocholithiasis.Endoscopic sphincterotomy or common bile ductexploration. Ann Surg 1991; 213: 627-633; discussion 633-634[PMID: 2039294].
  • 8Morino M, Baracchi F, Miglietta C, Furlan N, Ragona R,Garbarini A. Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versuslaparoendoscopic rendezvous in patients with gallbladder and bileduct stones. Ann Surg 2006; 244: 889-893; discussion 893-896[PMID: 17122614].
  • 9Iodice G, Giardiello C, Francica G, Sarrantonio G, AngeloneG, Cristiano S, Finelli R, Tramontano G. Single-step treatmentof gallbladder and bile duct stones: a combined endoscopiclaparoscopictechnique. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53: 336-338[PMID: 11231394].
  • 10Cuschieri A, Lezoche E, Morino M, Croce E, Lacy A, Toouli J,Faggioni A, Ribeiro VM, Jakimowicz J, Visa J, Hanna GB. E.A.E.S.multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vssingle-stage management of patients with gallstone disease andductal calculi. Surg Endosc 1999; 13: 952-957 [PMID: 10526025].

同被引文献60

引证文献10

二级引证文献113

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部