基于创新环境类型的企业年龄与创新绩效关系研究被引量：9

下载PDF

导出

摘要对于企业创新绩效的关注已经成为当前衡量企业创新能力的重要手段,特别是破坏性创新的概念提出以来,理论与实业界均给予了很多关注。本文以资源依赖理论、组织学习理论等为理论基础,基于184家上市公司2010年-2013年面板数据,以对创新环境的不同类型所导致的企业年龄与创新绩效的不同关系为研究对象。研究结果表明:企业的年龄与创新绩效的关系与企业所处的创新环境有关。企业在延续性创新环境中其年龄的增长与创新绩效正相关;而当企业的创新环境类型属于破坏性创新环境时,企业的年龄与其创新绩效负相关。 Concern for innovative performance has become an important means to measure the capability of enterprises, and theorists and businessmen have paid much attention to it especially since the concept of disruptive innovation was proposed. By ap- plying the resource dependence theory and the organizational learning theory, based on the panel data of 184 listed companies from 2010 to 2013, we research the relationship between the ages and the innovation performance of the companies caused from various types of innovation environments, The results show that the ages and the innovation performance of companies relate to the innovation environment. The age growth of companies in continuous innovation environment is positively related to innovation performance. When the company＇s innovation environment is disruptive, the age is negatively related to the innovation performance.

作者李寅龙

机构地区内蒙古师范大学经济学院中央财经大学商学院

出处《企业经济》北大核心 2015年第8期30-35,共6页 Enterprise Economy

基金教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目"基层畜牧业技术推广制度安排农技员推广行为与推广绩效研究"(批准号:12YJC790265) 内蒙古教育厅人文社会科学民族学重点研究基地项目"现代企业创新驱动发展战略研究"(批准号:14MZXJD014)

关键词创新环境企业年龄创新绩效破坏性创新 innovation environment company age innovation performance disruptive innovation

分类号 F270 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献18

1[奥] 约瑟夫·熊彼特.经济发展理论[M].北京:商务印书馆,2011.
2Dosi,Sources,procedures,and microeconomic effects of innovation[J].Journal of Economic Literature,1988,26(3):1120-1171.
3Lim,Jay Na.The Government as marketer of innovation[J].Engineering Construction&Architectural Management.2014,21(5):551-570.
4Hinloopen.J.Innovation performance across Europe[J].Economics of Innovation and New Technology,2003,12(2):145-161.
5Christensen.The innovator's Dilemma:When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail[M].Harvard:Harvard Publications,1997.
6Jesper B.Sorensen,Toby E Stuart.Aging,Obsolescence,and organizational innovation[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2000,45(1):81-112.
7Cohen,W.M.,S.Klepper.Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries:The case of process and product R&D[J].Review of Economics and Statistics,1996,78(2):223-243.
8顾力刚,韩福荣,徐艳梅.企业年龄研究[J].外国经济与管理,2000,22(12):8-12. 被引量：19
9刁兆峰,黎志成.企业商业年龄及其测定方法初探[J].科技进步与对策,2003,20(9):137-138. 被引量：10
10Pfeffer,Salancik,G.R.The external control of organizations[M].New York:Harper&Row,1978.

二级参考文献23

1顾力刚,韩福荣,徐艳梅.企业寿命剖析[J].北京工业大学学报（社会科学版）,2001,1(4):23-26. 被引量：9
2Arenano, M. and O. Bover, "Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error-Components Models", Journal of Econometrics, 1995, 68, 29-51.
3Arellano, M. and S. Bond, "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations", Review of Economic Studies, 1991, April, 277-297.
4Blundell, R. and S. Bond, "Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models", Journal of Econometrics, 1998, 87, 115-143.
5Blundell, R., R. Griffith, and J. Van Reenen, "Dynamic Count Data Models of Technological Innovation", Economic Journal, 1995, 105, 429, 333-344.
6Blundell, R. R. Griffith, and J. Van Reenen, "Market Share, Market Value and Innovation in a Panel of British Manufacturing Firms". Re'view of Econoraic Studies, 1999, 66(3), 529-554.
7Cohen, Wesley M. and Steven Klepper, "A Reprise of Size and R&D", Economic Journal, 1996,106, 925-951.
8Cohen, Wesley M., R. C. Levin, and D. C. Mowery, "Firm Size and R&D Intensity: A Re-Examination" Journal of Industrial Economics, 1987, 35, 543-563.
9Haskel, Jonathan and Christopher Martin, "Capacity and Competition: Empirical Evidence on UK Panel Data", Journal of Industrial Economics, 1994, 42(1), 23-44.
10Kumar, Nagesh and Mohammed Saqib, "Firm Size, Opportunities for Adaptation, and In-house R&D Activity in Developing Countries: The Case of Indian Manufacturing", Research Policy, 1996, 25 (5),712-722.