期刊文献+

运动决策平衡修订量表在中国高血压患者中信度、结构效度分析 被引量:16

Study on reliability and validity of the regular physical activity decision balance revised scale among the patients with hypertension in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的建立一套适合中国高血压患者的规律运动决策平衡量表。方法对来自于12个社区的559名高血压患者进行规律运动决策平衡量表问卷调查,量表19个条目,其中运动获益13个条目,运动代价6个条目,使用Cronbach’sα系数评价信度的内部一致性,使用重测相关系数评价重测信度,使用因子分析评价结构效度。结果决策平衡量表的Cronbach’sα系数为0.94,其中运动获益为0.96,运动代价为0.84;重测信度决策平衡、运动获益和运动代价分别为0.65、0.72和0.61,因子分析结果显示量表适合采用因子分析评价结构效度,可提取出2个公因子,累计64.17%可被这2个公因子解释。结论运动决策平衡量表具有很好的信度和结构效度,可作为评价高血压患者运动决策的量化工具。 Objective To validate a Chinese version of the regular physical activity decision balance scale( RPADBS) for hypertension patients. Methods A total of 559 hypertension patients were selected randomly from 12 communities in urban area of Wuhan. The regular physical activity decision balance scale included 19 items: gains( pros) 13 items and losses( cons) 6 items. Cronbanch's α coefficient and test-retest correlation were used for reliability test,and exploratory factor analysis was conducted for testing construct validity. Results The total Cronbach 's α coefficient was0. 94,while the Cronbach's α coefficient of pros subscale and cons subscale were 0. 96 and 0. 84,respectively. The Pearson test- retest reliability of total scale was 0. 65,0. 72 for pros and 0. 61 for cons,respectively. The exploratory factor analysis showed that the exploratory factor analysis was suitable for testing construct validity,two factors were obtained by the scale,and the rate of cumulative contribution were 64. 17%. Conclusions The regular physical activity decision balance scale has good reliability and validity. It can be applied as a quantitative tool for evaluation of decision balance for regular physical activity in hypertension patients.
出处 《中华疾病控制杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第8期831-834,共4页 Chinese Journal of Disease Control & Prevention
基金 香港理工大学护理学院资助(高血压自我健康管理社区干预研究 编号:1-ZV4D)
关键词 高血压 运动 问卷调查 Hypertension Exercise Questionnaires
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1World Health Organization. Physical activity and health in Eu-rope :evidence for action [ EB/OL]. (2006) [2015-03-26]. ht-tp://www. int/_data/assets/pdf_file/0011/87547/E89490. pdf.
  • 2Allison MJ, Keller C. Self-efficacy intervention effect on physicalactivity in older adults [ J] . West J Nurs Res, 2004,26( 1 ) :31-46.
  • 3Blair SN. Physical inactivity: the biggest public health problem ofthe 21st century [ J]. Br J Sports Med, 2009,43( 1) :1-2.
  • 4Colley RC, Garriguet D, Janssen I,et al. Physical activity of Ca-nadian adults : accelerometer results from the 2007 to 2009 Cana-dian Health Measures Survey [ J]. Health Rep,2011 ,22( 1 ) : 15-23.
  • 5Prochaska JO,Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of healthbehavior change [ J]. Am J Health Promot, 1997 ,12( 1 ) ;38-48.
  • 6Hutchison AJ, Breckon JD, Johnston LH. Physical activity behav-ior change interventions based on the transtheoretical model: asystematic review [ J]. Health Educ Behav,2009,36(5) :829-845.
  • 7许亮文,杨廷忠,马海燕,刘婷婕.对杭州市社区居民锻炼行为的干预效果观察[J].中国运动医学杂志,2004,23(3):313-315. 被引量:16
  • 8李灿,辛玲.调查问卷的信度与效度的评价方法研究[J].中国卫生统计,2008,25(5):541-544. 被引量:475
  • 9Marcus BH, Rakowski W, Rossi JS. Assessing motivational readi-ness and decision making for exercise [ J ]. Health Psychol,1992,11(4) ,257-261.
  • 10Laffrey SC, Lee YS. Decisional balance for exercise: adaptation ofan instrument for older Mexican American women [ J]. Res NursHealth, 2005,28(5):388-397.

二级参考文献50

共引文献560

同被引文献172

引证文献16

二级引证文献119

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部