摘要
目的：对全髋关节与人工股骨头两种置换术治疗股骨颈骨折的临床疗效进行比较。方法选择2012年12月～2014年12月前来我院进行治疗的80例股骨颈骨折患者作为研究对象，把所有患者随机分为研究组和对比组，对比组患者采用人工股骨头置换术进行治疗，研究组患者采用全髋关节置换术进行治疗，治疗后对两组患者临床疗效进行对比。结果研究组总有效率为98％，对比组总有效率为75％，两组数据对比差异比较明显（P ＜0.05）。结论患者采用全髋关节置换术进行治疗的临床效果明显，可以在很大程度上改善股骨颈骨折疾病症状。
Objective For total hip and two kinds of artificial femoral head replacement in the treatment of femoral neck fracture curative effect comparison. Methods In December 2012 to December 2014 to our hospital for treatment of 80 cases of femoral neck fracture patients as the research object, all the patients were randomly divided into research group and control group, control group were treated by artificial femoral head replacement for treatment, treatment group were treated by total hip replacement, the clinical effect of two groups of patients after treatment were compared. Results The group the total effective rate was 98%, control group total effective rate was 75%, two groups of data contrast are the obvious difference （P〈0.05）. Conclusion The treatment of patients with total hip replacement effect is obvious, can largely improve the femoral neck fracture disease symptoms.
出处
《中国继续医学教育》
2015年第21期124-125,共2页
China Continuing Medical Education
关键词
全髋关节置换术
人工股骨头置换术
股骨颈骨折
Total hip replacement
Artificial femoral head replacement
Femoral neck fracture
