期刊文献+

肛裂患者围手术期应用快速康复外科理念的治疗体会 被引量:6

The experience of treatment by applying fast track surgery on the patients of anal fissure in the perioperative period
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨快速康复外科理念(FTS)在肛裂患者围手术期中的应用效果。方法选取慢性肛裂患者70例,随机分为观察组(n=35)与对照组(n=35),观察组围手术期处理应用FTS,对照组围手术期处理采用传统方法,比较两组间手术情况及术后康复情况。结果观察组术后并发症轻于对照组(P<0.05),创面愈合时间及住院时间小于对照组(t=14.214、17.748,P<0.05),临床疗效优于对照组(χ2=4.590,P<0.05),两组间手术时间、术中出血量无明显差异(t=1.971、1.641,P>0.05)。结论在慢性肛裂围手术期应用FTS方案,治疗效果好,患者康复快。 Objective To explore the effect of fast track surgery on the patients of anal fissure in the perioperative pe- riod. Methods A total of 70 patients with chronic anal fissure were randomly divided into two groups: observation group (n=35) and the control group (n=35). The control group was treated with conventional methods, while the ob- servation group was treated with fast track surgery in the perioperative period. Terms of operation and postoperative re- habilitation were compared in two groups. Results Compared with the control group, the FTS group was better in fewer postoperative complications (P〈0.05), shorter wound healing time, less duration of hospitalization (t= 14.214, 17.748, P〈 0.05) and better cinical effect (x^2=4.590,P〈0.05). There was no significant difference in operation time and blood loss between two groups (t=1.971, 1.641 ,P〉0.05). Conclusion Fast track surgery in perioperative period of chronic anal fis- sure has better clinical effect, being helpful for patient's postoperative recovery.
出处 《中国现代医生》 2015年第20期70-72,共3页 China Modern Doctor
基金 山东省高校科技计划资助项目(J11LF84)
关键词 快速康复外科 围手术期 慢性肛裂 Fast track surgery(FTS) Perioperative period Chronic anal fissure
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献73

  • 1张东铭.肛裂解剖病因学研究的新进展[J].中国临床医生杂志,2006,34(9):11-13. 被引量:18
  • 2陈贵花,李燕,梁明娟.低位直肠癌保肛术后康复锻炼对肛门控便效果的探讨[J].岭南现代临床外科,2006,6(5):392-393. 被引量:3
  • 3江志伟,李宁,黎介寿.快速康复外科的概念及临床意义[J].中国实用外科杂志,2007,27(2):131-133. 被引量:1356
  • 4张学军.纵切横缝加侧方内括约肌切断术治疗慢性肛裂45例体会[J].重庆医学,2007,36(6):535-535. 被引量:3
  • 5安阿弱,主编.肛肠病学[M].北京;人民卫生出版社,1998:131-132.
  • 6Gouvas N, Tan E, Windsor A, et al. Fast-track vs standard care in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis update. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2009,24(10) : 1119-1131.
  • 7Hasenberg T, Keese M, Langle F, et al. 'Fast-track' colonic surgery in Austria and Germany--results from the survey on patterns in current perioperative practice. Colorectal Dis, 2009, 11(2): 162-167.
  • 8Arsalani-Zadeh R, Ullah S, Khan S, et al. Current pattern of perioperative practice in elective colorectal surgery; a questionnaire survey of ACPGBI members. Int J Surg, 2010, 8 (4) : 294-298.
  • 9Andersen J, Hjort-Jakobsen D, Christiansen PS, et al. Readmission rates after a planned hospital stay of 2 versus 3 days in fast- track colonic surgery. Br J Surg, 2007,94(7):890-893.
  • 10Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW, et al. Laparoscopy in Comb/nation with Fast Track Multimodal Management is the Best Perioperative Strategy in Patients Undergoing Colonic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg, 2011,254 (6) : 868-875.

共引文献448

同被引文献27

引证文献6

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部