期刊文献+

湍球塔床层液相含率预测的数学模拟

Mathematical Modeling of Bed Liquid Holdup of Turbulent Contact Absorber
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用搭建的湍球塔实验装置,考察了操作气速、静床高度、喷淋液量、支承网开孔率和湍球直径等参数对湍球塔床层压降和液相含率的影响特性;运用因次分析π定理和偏最小二乘法,得到了液相含率的回归模型。引入前人Gel和V-Noakovic模型,并基于文献实验数据对各模型预测效果作了对比分析。结果表明,偏最小二乘法处理小容量液相含率样本和自变量强相关问题行之有效,用液相含率新模型预测两组文献实验数据的均方百分比误差分别为2.5%和3.1%,预测的精确度优于Gel和V-Noakovic模型,且新模型适用范围更大。偏最小二乘法用于湍球塔床层液相含率预测建模切实可行。 Hydrodynamics experiments were carried out in a pilot-scale turbulent contact absorber (TCA), and the effects of experimental parameters, such as operation gas velocity, static bed height, free open area of grid, ball diameter on bed pressure drop and liquid holdup were investigated. The liquid holdup regression model was presented using Buchingham π-theorem and partial least squares regression(PLSR) algorithm. Furthermore, the 2 liquid holdup models respectively proposed by Gel perin and V-Noakovic were cited, to compare with the new liquid holdup model. Then the 3 models were evaluated based on literature experimental data. The results showed that PLSR algorithm was effective in handling the samples with small capacity and variables with strong correlation. The accuracy and precision of the liquid holdup model by PLSR was better than those of the models cited from literature. By validating with 2 groups of experimental data in literature, the mean square errors(MSPE) of the new liquid holdup model were 2.5% and 3.1%, respectively. The accuracy and precision of predicting liquid holdup was better than those of Gel perin's and V-Noakovic's models, which indicated that the partial least-squares regression algorithm to predict TCA bed liquid holdup was feasible.
出处 《化学反应工程与工艺》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第4期307-314,共8页 Chemical Reaction Engineering and Technology
关键词 湍球塔 液相含率预测 偏最小二乘回归法 流体动力学 turbulent contact absorber liquid holdup forecasting partial least-squares regression hydrodynamics
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Wen C, Chang C. Absorption of sulfur dioxide in lime and limestone slurry: pressure drop effect on turbulent contact absorberperformance[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1978, 12(6): 703-707.
  • 2周向,LEI Cheng,Tim C. Keener,宋存义.湍球塔捕集烟气中低浓度二氧化碳特性[J].化工学报,2011,62(11):3269-3275. 被引量:1
  • 3Haq A, Inayat M H, Zaman M, et al. Liquid holdup in a pilot-scale turbulent contact absorber–an experimental and comparative study[J].Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2010, 33(12): 2059-2065.
  • 4Wozniak M. Pressure drop and effective interfacial area in a column with a nozzle bed[J]. Int Chem Eng, 1977, (17): 553-559.
  • 5Uchida S, Chang C S, Wen C Y. Mechanics of a turbulent contact absorber[J]. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 1977,55(4): 392-396.
  • 6Kito M, Tabei K, Murata K. Gas and liquid holdups in mobile beds under the countercurrent flow of air and liquid[J]. Industrial &Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development, 1978, 17(4): 568-571.
  • 7Soundarajan K, Krishnaiah K. Hydrodynamics of single-stage turbulent bed contactor with downcomer[J]. Indian Journal of ChemicalTechnology, 1999, 6: 152-160.
  • 8Bruce A E R, Balasubramanian R, Sai P S T, et al. Modelling of hydrodynamics in a type I turbulent bed contactor[J]. ChemicalEngineering Science, 2006, 61(6): 2089-2095.
  • 9王淑勤,胡满银,高香林.湍球塔阻力特性的冷态试验研究[J].华北电力大学学报(自然科学版),1997,24(1):72-76. 被引量:8
  • 10刘国瑞,高翔,张港,周勇平,程峰,骆仲泱,岑可法.湍球塔湿法脱硫的试验研究[J].热力发电,2003,32(6):22-25. 被引量:8

二级参考文献79

共引文献114

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部