期刊文献+

反垄断中止调查与终止调查制度:契约化还是行政化 被引量:1

Mechanism of Suspension and Termination of Investigation in Antitrust Enforcement of China:Contractualization v.Administrationization
原文传递
导出
摘要 为提高效率,许多国家或地区将契约机制引入到反垄断执法制度中。我国反垄断中止调查与终止调查制度虽然具有一定的契约化特征,但行政化色彩仍十分浓厚。基于和解正义、效率、国情等方面的考量,其应扩大契约化的因素,减少行政化因素。故此,我国应转变"中止调查决定"加"终止调查决定"的二元结构为"终止调查决定"的一元结构,赋予相对人缔约救济权和情事变更请求权,同时,应以违约责任的多种形式强化承诺履行保障机制。 In order to enhance efficiency, lots of developed countries or areas introduce contractual rules to antitrust en- forcement system, which is reflected by the mechanism of suspension and termination of investigation in anti- trust enforcement of our country. However, the mechanism of our country said above has overfull qualities of administration. Although it can' t get rid of the two side features, considering the factors of the settlement jus- tice, enforcement efficiency and the civilization construction, the mechanism should expand qualities of contract and reduce qualities of administration. Hence, the right way is to change the mechanism of suspension and ter- mination of investigation into a new mechanism of termination of investigation, give the investigated the rights to relieve and apply for modification of the decision of cessation of investigation when material changes have taken place in respect of the facts, and make the safeguard measures for performance of commitments more effective bv introducing the forms of liabilities for breach of contract.
作者 王炳
出处 《中国行政管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第9期123-128,共6页 Chinese Public Administration
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究基金项目"反垄断法中的经营者集中附条件许可问题研究"(项目编号:10YJC820102) 江苏省社科基金项目"经济发展方式转变与反垄断法实施指南制度研究"(项目编号:12FXB002) 南京航空航天大学哲学社会科学基金项目"‘大调解’机制规范化研究"(项目编号:V0983-101)
关键词 反垄断中止调查 反垄断终止调查 契约化 扩张 行政化 Mechanism of suspension and termination of investigation in antitrust enforcement; contractualization; expansion; administrationization; reduction
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1胡建辉.电信和联通价格垄断案正依法处理[N].法制日报,2014-2-20.
  • 2George Stephanov Georgiev. Contagious Efficiency: The Growing Reliance on U. S. tlements in EU Law. Utah (2007). -Style Antitrust Set- Law Review, 2007.
  • 3[美]E.吉尔霍恩,W.E科瓦希克.反垄断法律与经济[M].王晓晔,注.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001.
  • 4[美]理查德·A·波斯纳.反托拉斯法[M].孙秋宁译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003.
  • 5Wouter P. J. Wils. The Use of Settlements in Public Antitrust Enforcement: Objectives and Principles. World Competition, 2008 (31 ).
  • 6Christopher J. Cook. Commitment Decisions: The Law and Practice under Article 9. World Competition, 2006 (29).
  • 7刘桂清.反垄断执法中的和解制度研究[J].当代法学,2009,23(2):23-29. 被引量:13
  • 8曾坚.从契约文明看行政信赖保护的法文化基础[J].政治与法律,2009(1):65-72. 被引量:1
  • 9Sonja Eibl. Commitment Decisions: An Australian Perspective. European Competition Law Review, 2005, (26).
  • 10Alberto Pera & Michele Carpagnano. The Law and Practice of Commitment Decisions: A Comparative Analysis. European Competition Law Review, 2008 (29).

二级参考文献36

共引文献29

同被引文献17

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部