摘要
目的比较药敏纸片扩散法与仪器法在阴道加德纳菌鉴定中的应用效果。方法收集100例宫颈分泌物标本进行研究,分别利用药敏纸片扩散法与仪器法进行鉴定。观察记录两种方法的最终检测结果,并进行比较。结果 100例标本均分别经药敏纸片扩散法与仪器法鉴定,最后的鉴定结果显示,药敏纸片扩散法一共鉴定出阴道加德纳菌36例,药敏纸片周围均出现明显的抑菌环。利用仪器法进行鉴定,同样鉴定出阴道加德纳菌36例。对2组的阴道加德纳菌鉴定结果进行比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论在对阴道加德纳菌进行鉴定,利用药敏纸片扩散法与仪器法的最终鉴定结果一致。但药敏纸片扩散法较之仪器法更加简单经济,实用性更强。
Objective To compare the application effect of disk diffusion method and the instrument method in the identification of Gardnerella vaginalis .Methods 100 samples of cervical secretion were collected and identified by the disk diffusion method and the instrument method .The final detection result of the two methods were observed and compared .Results The 100 specimens were respectively identified by the disk diffusion method and the instru‐ment method .The final identification results showed that 36 cases of Gardnerella vaginalis were identified by the disk diffusion method and there were obvious bacteriostatic ring around the drug sensitive paper .The same 36 cases of Gardnerella vaginalis were identified by the instrument method .The identification results had no statistical difference between the two kinds of method （P〉0 .05） .Conclusion The disk diffusion method and instrument method have the same results for identifying Gardnerella vaginalis .But the disk diffusion method is more simple ,more economic and stronger in practicability than the instrument method .
出处
《检验医学与临床》
CAS
2015年第17期2600-2602,共3页
Laboratory Medicine and Clinic
关键词
加德纳菌鉴定
药敏纸片扩散法
仪器法
Gardnerella vaginalis identification
disk diffusion method
instrument method
