摘要
目的探讨内镜治疗上消化道出血的临床效果。方法选取上消化道出血的140例患者,将患者随机分成4组,采用不同的止血方法治疗患者,氩气刀组、注射组、钛夹组、喷洒组各35例。对比4组的止血效果。结果氩气刀组、注射组、钛夹组、喷洒组4组最终的治疗有效率分别为97.1%、80%、80%、82.9%,组间数据对比可看出,氩气刀组的治疗效果显著优于其他3组,氩气刀组和注射组的再次出血率显著低于喷洒组、钛夹组。氩气刀组的患者满意度显著高于其他3组。氩气刀组与其他3组以上指标差异均存在统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论内镜下采用氩气刀治疗上消化道出血患者的再次出血率低,疗效显著,值得推广。
Objective To explore the clinical effect of endoscopic treatment for upper gastrointestinal bleeding.Methods 140 patients with upper digestive tract hemorrhage were randomly divided into 4 groups （n=35）, to compare the hemostatic effect of the 4 groups.Results the treatment effect of argon knife group was signiifcantly better than the other 3 groups,and the bleeding rate of the argon knife group and the injection group was signiifcantly lower than that of the spraying and titanium clips. The satisfaction of patients with argon knife group was signiifcantly higher than the other 3 groups. There were signiifcant differences in the above indexes between the argon knife group and the other 3 groups （P〈0.05）. ConclusionTthe bleeding rate of upper digestive tract hemorrhage patients treated with argon knife is lower, the effect is remarkable, and it is worth promoting.
出处
《当代医学》
2015年第26期27-28,共2页
Contemporary Medicine
关键词
内镜
上消化道出血
临床疗效
氩气刀
钛夹
喷洒
Endoscopy
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Clinical efifcacy
Argon
Titanium clips
Spray
