期刊文献+

ffh基因沉默对变形链球菌耐氟菌株耐酸性的影响

Evaluation of the effect for ffh gene silencing on the aciduricity of fluoride resistant Streptococcus mutans
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 :分析ffh基因沉默对变形链球菌耐氟菌株体外耐酸能力的影响。方法 :利用电穿孔法,将si RNA转入UA159-FR,使其与ffh基因靶向位点结合,筛选出含ffh基因沉默的变形链球菌耐氟菌株,与UA159-FR的标准菌液分别在不同p H值(以0.5为间隔,p H为3.5~7.5)的BHI液体培养基中37℃微需氧(95%N2、5%CO2)培养24 h,离心,采用p H计测定培养物上清的终末p H值;5 m L生理盐水稀释细菌沉淀,用紫外分光光度计测定600 nm处的吸光度,采用SPSS 17.0软件包对所得数据进行统计学分析。结果:原菌株UA159-FR与ffh基因沉默的变形链球菌UA159-FR相比,Δp H差异显著(P〈0.05),且前者高于后者。两者比较p H=3.5~5.0时,OD600有显著差异(P〈0.01);p H=5.5~7.5时,OD600有显著差异(P〈0.05),且两者生长趋势相似。结论:ffh基因沉默对变形链球菌耐氟菌株的耐酸性有一定影响。 PURPOSE: To analyze the effect of ffh gene silencing on the aciduricity of fluoride resistant Streptococcus mutans in vitro. METHODS: By using electroporation, UA159-FR was transformed and combined with targeted site of ffh gene sequence, and the best piece of si RNA for fluoride resistant Streptococcus mutans was screened. In different values of p H of BHI, they were cultured for 24 hours with UA159-FR respectively, and then centrifugated to determine the p H and OD600.SPSS17.0 software package was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: The aciduricity of UA159-FR had significant differences compared with ffh gene silencing for UA159-FR in Δp H(P〈0.05), and the former was higher than the latter. At p H=3.5 ~5.0, P〈0.01; at p H=5.5 ~7.5, P〈0.05. Significant differences were noted in OD600 and their growth tendency were similar. CONCLUSIONS: The aciduricity of fluoride resistant Streptococcus mutans has significant effect when the ffh gene is silenced.
出处 《上海口腔医学》 CAS CSCD 2015年第4期395-399,共5页 Shanghai Journal of Stomatology
基金 国家自然科学基金(3A411X463431)~~
关键词 FFH 基因沉默 变形链球菌耐氟菌株 耐酸性 ffh Gene silencing Fluoride resistant Streptococcus mutans Aciduricity
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Chansley PE, Kral TA. Transformation of fluoride resistance genes in Streptococcus mutans [J]. Infect Immun, 1989, 57(7): 1968-1970.
  • 2Gutierrez JA, Crowley PJ, Cvitkovitch DG, et al. Streptococcus mutans ffh, a gene encoding a homologue of the 54 kDa subunit of the signal recognition particle, is involved in resistance to acid stress [J]. Microbiology, 1999, 145(2): 357-366.
  • 3Burnett JC, Rossi JJ, Tiemann K. Current progress of siRNA/shRNA therapeutics in clinical trials [J]. Biotechnol J, 2011, 6(9): 1130-1146.
  • 4张桐菲,王城坤,洪丽华,张志民.变形链球菌耐氟菌ffh基因siRNA干扰序列的筛选鉴定[J].中国实验诊断学,2014,18(1):10-13. 被引量:2
  • 5梁伟,张文君,高青梅,陆惠娜,黄滨滨,修冰,梁爱斌.利用siRNA靶向沉默Jeko-1细胞survivin mRNA基因的实验研究[J].中国实验血液学杂志,2012,20(1):88-92. 被引量:6
  • 6李鸣宇,朱彩莲,汪俊.龋病相关牙菌斑4种主要细菌的体外耐酸能力分析[J].中国微生态学杂志,2013,25(1):42-44. 被引量:6
  • 7Matsui R, Cvitkovitch D. Acid tolerance mechanisms utilized by Streptococcus mutans [J]. Future Microbiol,2010, 5(3): 403-417.
  • 8Svensater G, Larsson UB, Greif EC, et al. Acid tolerance response and survival by oral bacteria[J].Oral Microbiol Immunol, 1997, 12(5): 266-273.
  • 9Kremer BH, van der Kraan M, Crowley PJ, et al. Characterization of the sat operon in Streptococcus mutans : evidence for a role of ffh in acid tolerance [J]. J Bacteriol, 2001, 183(8): 2543-2552.
  • 10Shen K, Wang Y, Hwang Fu YH, et al. Molecular mechanism of GTPase activation at the signal recognition particle (SRP) RNA distal end [J]. J Biol Chem, 2013, 288(51): 36385-36397.

二级参考文献42

  • 1徐仰龙,杨德琴.变形链球菌粘附调节基因研究进展[J].国际口腔医学杂志,2008,35(S1):96-99. 被引量:8
  • 2朱敏,张志民,张家颖,武广恒,高心.干酪乳杆菌中耐酸相关基因ffh的检测及克隆[J].口腔医学研究,2004,20(4):395-397. 被引量:3
  • 3严燕国,詹文华,赵刚,马晋平,蔡世荣.SiRNA特异性抑制幽门螺杆菌CagA基因表达的实验研究[J].中国人兽共患病学报,2006,22(4):330-333. 被引量:2
  • 4Miyashita T,Reed JC.Bcl-2 oncoprotein blocks chemotherapy-induced apoptosis in a human leukemia cell line.Blood,1993;81(1):151-169.
  • 5Lowe SW,Bodis S,McClatchey A,et al.p53 statues and theefficacy of cancer therapy in vivo.Science,1994;266(5186):807-810.
  • 6Schmitt CA,Lowe SW.Bcl-2 mediates chemoresistance inmatched pairs of primary E(mu)-myc lymphomas in vivo.BloodCells Mol Dis,2001;27(1):206-216.
  • 7Schmitt CA,Rosenthal CT,Lowe SW.Genetic analysis ofchemoresistance in primary marine Lymphomas.Nat Med,2000;6(9):1029-1035.
  • 8Pennati M,Folini M,Zaffaroni N.Targeting survivin in cancertherapy:fulfilled promises and open questions.Carcinogenesis,2007;28(6):1133-1139.
  • 9CoiffierB,Lepage E,Briere J,et al.CHOP chemotherapy plusrituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients withdiffuse large-B-cell lymphoma.N Engl J Med,2002;346(4):235-242.
  • 10Pfreundschuh M,Trumper L,Osterborg A,et al.CHOP-likechemotherapy plus rituximab versus CHOP-like chemotherapy alonein young patients with good-prognosis diffuse large-B-cell lym-phoma:a randomized controlled trial by the MabThera InternationalTrial(MInT)Group.Lancet Oncol,2006;7(5):379-391.

共引文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部