摘要
任何时空的法律,都存在法律的有限性与案件的复杂性之间的矛盾。如何解决这一矛盾,唐朝在总结前朝比附滥用的教训后,关于比附的立法非常审慎。《唐律疏议》中的比附包括"轻重相举"和列举式比附两种情况。但是,"轻重相举"与比附的外延并不完全相同,因为"轻重相举"分为逻辑上的轻重和事理上的轻重,前者属于当然解释,后者则属于比附。《唐律疏议》关于比附的适用条件规定得非常周密和严格,有效地约束了司法官比附裁断案件的恣意性。
The analogy in Tang Code included the following two cases Qing Zhong Xiang Ju in the Conviction Without Legal＇and list - style analogy. But the extension between Qing Zhong Xiang Ju and analogy was not identical. Because Qing Zhong Xiang Ju included the logical degree of seriousness and the sensible degree of seriousness. The former belonged to explanation for granted and the latter was analogy. After summarizing the lessons of analogy ,abuse in former dynasties, the legislation of analogy was very cautious in Tang Code. The applicable conditions of analogy were very thorough and strict in Tang Code which constrained the arbitrariness of determining cases by analogy effectively.
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第5期143-151,共9页
Legal Forum
