摘要
论文以对霍姆斯、图里关于翻译学实证性学科定位的内容回顾与问题思考为起点,在揭示其学科定位与学科分支划分之矛盾的基础上探讨了实证性翻译研究的意义与限度,指出了规约性翻译研究在翻译学学科整体中的地位,认为实证性学科定位抹杀了翻译学的人文性,不足以概括翻译学作为一个学科整体的性质,反映的只是霍姆斯、图里所勾画的纯翻译学分支的性质。人文社会科学研究的最根本目标是促进人类社会的健全和协调发展,因此,作为人文社会科学的翻译学不仅应当是实证性的,而且应当是规约性的。
With a historical survey and critical reflection of Holmes Toury＇s map of translation studies as the starting point,this paper reveals the contradiction between their defining of translation studies as an empirical discipline and their branch division of the discipline,analyses the significances and limitations of empirical translation studies,and locates the position of prescriptive translation studies on the map of the whole discipline.It holds mat the defining of translation studies as an empirical discipline obliterates the humanistic character of translation studies,reflects only the nature of the branch ‘pure translation studies＇,not the nature of translation studies as a whole discipline.The utmost goal of humanistic and social sciences is to enhance a sound and coordinated social development,and therefore,translation studies,as a humanistic and social science,ought to be both empirical and prescriptive.
出处
《北京第二外国语学院学报》
2015年第6期23-29,共7页
Journal of Beijing International Studies University
基金
国家社科基金项目"翻译语境论构建研究"(12BYY014)
湖南省社科基金项目"断裂与延续:翻译规范的学术史研究"(12YBA114)的阶段性成果
关键词
翻译学
学科性质
学科分支
实证
规约
translation studies
the nature of the discipline
branch division of the discipline
empirical
prescriptive
