摘要
目的：分析比较腋静脉留置针与头皮或上肢静脉留置针在静脉营养治疗中的应用效果。方法本研究纳入新生儿科2011年1月至2012年6月收治的100例需要静脉营养的患儿作为研究对象，将这100例患儿按不同的输液方式分为两组，实验组采用腋静脉留置针途径输注，对照组采用头皮或上肢静脉留置针途径输注。通过记录留置的时间、观察患儿烦躁哭闹情况、发生输液外渗、堵塞及静脉炎等并发症情况进行比较。结果实验组留置的时间为（6.25±1.42） d，烦躁哭闹发生率8.93％，并发症发生率12.5％；对照组留置的时间是（3.05±0.86）d，烦躁哭闹发生率25％，并发症发生率45.5％；两组比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论在行静脉营养治疗中，选用腋静脉留置针途径效果明显优于头皮或上肢静脉留置针，值得临床推广应用。
Objective To compare the clinical effects between the axillary vein and the scalp vein or upper limbs vein detained needle when being used for neonatal intravenous nutrition.Methods 100 neonates needing for in-travenous nutrition from Januanry 2011 to June 2012 were randomly divided into 2 groups： the axillary vein detained needle group （ experiment group） , the scalp vein or upper limbs vein detained needle group （ control group） .Retaining time, crying incidence and complication incidence were compared.Results The retaining time, crying incidence and complication incidence of experiment group were （6.25±1.42） d, 8.93%and 12.5%respectively.The retaining time, crying incidence and complication incidence of control group were （3.05±0.86） d, 25%and 45.5%respectively.The differences between the two groups were significant.Conclusion The axillary vein detained needle is better than the scalp vein or upper limbs vein detained needle.It can be used widely in clinic.
出处
《国际护理学杂志》
2015年第16期2290-2292,共3页
international journal of nursing
关键词
腋静脉
头皮静脉
上肢静脉
留置针
静脉营养治疗
Axillary vein
Scalp vein
Upper limbs vein
Detained needle
Intravenous nutrition therapy
