从专业逻辑到资本逻辑:中国电影生产主体的社会网络分析——基于2004-2014年电影制片人和导演的合作关系被引量：12

From Professionalization to Capitalization:the Social Network Analysis on Movie Makers in China based on the Partnership Between Movie Producers and Directors from 2004 to 2014

原文传递

导出

摘要本研究采用社会网络分析方法分析了2004-2014年国内片票房较高的电影职员表中的电影制片人和导演的合作关系,通过分析发现和2004年相比,2013年电影生产者关系网络的密度、度数中心性和中间中心性都保持了上升。同时,一部分制片人群体逐渐占据了网络中的中心地位。说明电影制片人的角色回归,电影生产主体关系网络越来越走向不均衡和中心化、集权化,电影生产关系网络以少数电影公司为核心形成不同的"圈子"。以资本为逻辑的"跨业"、"跨界"和协同生产的电影生产机制逐步形成。 Based on staff tables of chosen films from 2004 to 2014, which represent the partnership between movie producers and directors, this paper uses social network analysis to study changes of cooperative relation in from 2004 to 2009 and 2013. The results show that compared to 2004, the network density and centrality are higher. Meanwhile, some movie producers＇ point centrality and betweenness centrality gain a significant increase, which means they start to occupy the core positions in the network. The logic of capitalization is also the deep factor that leads to producer-centered production mechanism and company- cored production network. In the future, more trans-boundary production and collaborative production will appear. The boundary among different media industry will also tend to be blurred.

作者李彪陈璐瑶

机构地区中国人民大学新闻学院中国人民大学新闻与社会发展研究中心

出处《国际新闻界》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第7期114-133,共20页 Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication

基金 "中国人民大学科学研究基金项目明德青年学者计划"(资助编号:14XNJ025)的部分成果~~

关键词电影生产资本逻辑社会网络分析生产霸权 film production, capital logic, social network analysis, production hegemony

分类号 J943 [艺术—电影电视艺术]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献10

1林天强.从制片人中心制、电影作者论到完全导演论——对好莱坞、新浪潮和中国电影新生代的一个模型推演[J].当代电影,2011(2):110-116. 被引量：14
2莫斯可.2013,《传播政治经济学》(胡春阳等译).上海:译文出版社.
3喻国明,等.2009,《传媒经济学教程》.北京:中国人民大学出版社.
4Caldwell, J. T..2009, Method: artifacts and cultural practices in production studies. In Caldwell, J T. (ed). Production culture: industrial retlexivity and critical practice in tilm and television. Durham:Duke University Press, 121-124.
5Corts, H. S..2001, The strategic effects of vertical market structure: common agency and divisionalization in the US motion picture industry. Jouraa 1 of Economics & Management Strategy, 10(4),509-528.
6Ortner, S. B. .2009, Studying sideways: ethnographic access in Hollywood. In Mayer, V., Banks, M. J., & Caldwell, J. T. (eds.). Production studies: cultural studies of media industries. Routledge, 175-189.
7Powdermaker, H. (1950). Hollywood, the Dream Factory. Boston: Little Brown.
8Rosten, L. (1970). Hollywood: the Movie Colony, the Movie Makers. N.Y.:Arno Press.
9Scott, A. J. .2005, On Hollywood: the Place, the Industry. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. In Mayer, V. (ed). Below the line: producers and production studies in the new television economy. Durham: Duke University Press Books, 71-73.
10Sullivan, J. L. .2009, Leo C. Rosten' s Hollywood: power, status, and the primacy of economic and social networks in cultural production. In Mayer, V., Banks, M. J., & Caldwell, J. T. (eds.). Production studies: cultural studies of media industries. Routledge, 39-53.