摘要
我国《商标法》第63条规定,对恶意侵犯商标专用权,情节严重的,可以在权利人因侵权受到的损失、侵权人因侵权获得的利益或者注册商标使用许可费的一倍以上三倍以下确定赔偿数额。该规定以立法的形式将惩罚性损害赔偿明确引入我国知识产权法领域,然而在具体的司法实践中,如何确定惩罚性损害赔偿的适用情形和标准,惩罚性损害赔偿金又如何与现有制度相协调,都需要进一步探讨。本文试运用法解释学、比较法、实证分析等方法对该问题进行研究并提出建议。
China＇s ＂trademark law＂ was enacted on May 1, 2014, the provisions of article sixty--third, the malicious infringement of trademark, if the circumstances are serious, be in the right person for infringement by the loss, the infringer from infringement interests or registered trademark licensing fees, a more than three times the amount of compensation is de- termined. The compensation amount should be reasonable expenses including the right to stop the infringing act paid. The provisions of a breakthrough significance for the punitive compensation system into the field of intellectual property law in china. However, in the concrete judicial practice, how to determine the specific type of standard concerning the application of punitive damages of trademark infringement, punitive damages and how to coordinate the legal compensation system, is the need to further consider the problem. In this paper, the use of legal hermeneutics, comparative method, empirical analysis method to ex- plore the problems and puts forward some suggestions, to better improve our legal system of intellectual property rights.
出处
《法学评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第5期148-151,共4页
Law Review
关键词
知识产权法
商标法
惩罚性赔偿
惩罚性赔偿金
Intellectual Property Law
Trademark Law
Punitive Damages
Punitive Damages
