期刊文献+

家庭支持型主管行为对员工工作态度的影响:有调节的中介效应分析 被引量:27

The Effects of Family-Supported Supervisor Behavior on Work Attitudes: A Moderated Mediating Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 采用问卷法调查了358名企业员工,探讨家庭支持型主管行为(FSSB)对工作满意感和离职意愿等工作态度的作用机制。结果表明:(1)FSSB对工作满意感有显著正向影响,对离职意愿有显著负向影响。(2)工作-家庭增益在FSSB与工作满意感之间起着中介作用,而工作-家庭冲突的中介作用不显著;工作-家庭增益与冲突在FSSB与离职意愿之间的中介作用均不显著。(3)边界控制感调节了FSSB—工作-家庭增益—工作满意感这一中介过程。本研究提示可通过干预FSSB来提升员工的工作态度。 Family-supported supervisor behavior (FSSB) is a support behavior of family and personal life from supervisors. It always acts as an important organizational work-family resource. Family-supported supervisor behavior is defined as those behaviors exhibited by supervisors that are supportive of families and consists of the following four dimensions--emotional support, instrumental support, role modeling behaviors, and creative work-family management (Hammer, Kossek, Zimmerman, & Daniels, 2007). Recent research has demonstrated that employee perceptions of FSSB are positively related to work attitude over and above the effects of general supervisor support (Hammer, Kossek, Yragui, Bodner, & Hanson, 2009). Conservation of resources (COR) theory posits that those with initial resource reservoirs have a tendency towards accumulation and enrichment of resources over time, that is, a tendency towards resource caravans (Hobfoll, 2002). Based on conservation of resources theory, the present study was to investigate the mechanism of linking family-supported supervisor behavior to work attitudes through work-family enrichment and whether the conflict is moderated by the level of perceived individual boundary control. A total of 358 employees were assessed using family supportive supervisor behavior (FSSB) scale, work-family conftjct scale, work-family enrichment scale, intention to leave scale, job satisfaction scale and perceived individual boundary control scale. The results indicated that: (1) family-supported supervisor behavior predicted job satisfaction(r = .37,p〈 .001) and intention to leave (r= -.24, p〈 .001). (2) The positive relationship between family-supported supervisor behavior and job satisfaction was partly mediated by work-family enrichment (β= .26, p〈 .001) such that having a supportive supervisor was associated with high work-family enrichment, which, in turn, were related to high job satisfaction. Work-family enrichment was not a significant mediator between family-supported supervisor behavior and intention to leave (v= -. 10, p〉 .05), while work-family conflict was not a significant mediator (β= .08, p〉.05). (3) Perceived individual boundary control moderated the mediated effect of work-family enrichment. Family-supported supervisor behavior interacted with perceived individual boundary control and significantly predicted work-family enrichment 66= .09, p〈 .05). Work-family enrichment significantly predicted job satisfaction (β=. 17, p〈 .01). The positive relationship between family-supported supervisor behavior and job satisfaction mediated by work-family enrichment was stronger for employees in having higher perceived individual boundary control (β= .42, t=5.67;p〈 .001) than lower boundary control (β= .23, t=3.68; p〈 .001). With the increase of the perceived individual boundary control, the effect of family-supported supervisor behavior on work-family enrichment became larger. All in all, the present study not only revealed how family-supported supervisor behavior influenced work attitude, but also revealed when this effect was strong. The theoretical implications of the findings were discussed. Given that family-supported supervisor behavior is seen as a trainable behavior, organizations should consider encouraging supervisors engaged in these family-supported behaviors, which would develop positive work attitude of employees. This study can also improve the work-family intervention of family-supported supervisor behavior.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期1194-1200,共7页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金青年项目(31200795) 国家自然科学基金重大研究计划重点支持项目(91324201) 华中师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目(CCNU14Z02015)的资助
关键词 家庭支持型主管行为 工作-家庭冲突 工作-家庭增益 边界控制感 工作态度 family-supported supervisor behavior, work-family conflict, work-family enrichment, perceived boundary control, work attitude
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1李永鑫,赵娜.工作-家庭支持的结构与测量及其调节作用[J].心理学报,2009,41(9):863-874. 被引量:98
  • 2温忠麟,叶宝娟.有调节的中介模型检验方法:竞争还是替补?[J].心理学报,2014,46(5):714-726. 被引量:1311
  • 3Allen, T. D. (2001). Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. JournM of VocationM Behavior, 58, 414-435.
  • 4Amstad, F. T., Meier, L. L., Fasel, U., Effering, A., & Semmer, N. K. (2011). A recta-analysis of work-family conflict and various,outcomes with a special emphasis on cross-domain versus matching-domain relations. Journal of OccupationM Health Psychology, 16, 151-169.
  • 5Bagger, J., & Li, A. (2011). How does supervisory family support influence employees' attitudes and behaviors? A social exchange perspective.Journal of Management, 40, 1123-1150.
  • 6Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical eonsideration Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
  • 7Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, G. D., & Klesh, J. (1983). Michigan organizational assessment questionnaire. Assessing Organizational Change: A Guide to Methods, Measures, and Practices, 40, 71-138.
  • 8Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M.,Wayne, J. H., &Grzywacz, J. G. (2006). Measuring the positive side of the work-family interface: Development and validation of a work-family enrichment scale. Journal o Vocational Behavior, 68, 131-164.
  • 9Dearing, E., & Hamilton, L C. (2006). Contemporary advances and classic advice for analyzing mediating and moderating variables. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 71, 88-104.
  • 10Demerouti, E. (2012). The spillover and crossover of resources among partners: The role of work-self and family-self facilitation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17, 184-195.

二级参考文献10

共引文献1403

同被引文献214

  • 1聂正安.合法型统治取向与中国企业组织体系的重建[J].社会科学战线,2000(6):20-25. 被引量:1
  • 2王钦.心理学方法与企业管理科学发展[J].经济管理,2004,30(20):30-35. 被引量:4
  • 3周浩,龙立荣.共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):942-950. 被引量:3723
  • 4李晓轩,李超平,时勘.科研组织工作满意度及其与工作绩效的关系研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005,26(1):16-19. 被引量:44
  • 5Allen, T. D. (2001) . Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behav- ior, 58, 414-435.
  • 6Aryee, S., Chu, C. W. L., Kim, T. Y., & Ryu, S. (2013) . Family- supportive work environment and employee work behaviors: Aninvestigation of mediating mechanisms. Journal of Management, 39, 792-813.
  • 7Aryee, S., Srinivas, E. S., & Tan, H. H. (2005) . Rhythms of life: Antecedents and outcomes of work-family balance in employed parents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 132-146.
  • 8Bagger, J., & Li, A. (2014) . How does supervisory family support influence employees' attitudes and behaviors? A social ex- change perspective. Journal of Management, 40, 1123-1150.
  • 9Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) . The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
  • 10Carlson, D. S., Hunter, E. M., Ferguson, M., & Whitten, D. (2014) . Work-family enrichment and satisfaction: Mediating processes and relative impact of originating and receiving do- mains. Journal of Man%ement, 40, 845-865.

引证文献27

二级引证文献144

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部