期刊文献+

腹腔镜联合手术治疗肠粘连合并阑尾炎的临床疗效及安全性评价 被引量:6

The Clinical Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Laparoscopic Surgery in the Treatment of Intestinal Adhesion Appendicitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究与分析腹腔镜联合手术治疗肠粘连合并阑尾炎的临床疗效及安全性。方法选取我院自2014年5月~2015年5月收治的120例肠粘连合并阑尾炎患者,采取随机数字表法分为常规治疗组与联合治疗组,每组各60例,常规治疗组给予常规开腹手术,联合治疗组给予腹腔镜阑尾切除术联合肠粘连松解术,对比二者临床效果。结果联合治疗组较常规治疗组相比,手术时间缩短、出血量减少、肠蠕动恢复时间缩短、住院时间缩短,P〈0.05,差异具有统计学意义。常规治疗组的并发症发生率为16.67%,联合治疗组的并发症发生率为3.33%,联合治疗组的并发症发生率低于常规治疗组,P〈0.05,差异具有统计学意义。结论对于肠粘连合并阑尾炎的患者采用腹腔镜阑尾切除术联合肠粘连松解术治疗可取得治疗效果,不仅减少了手术创伤,同时具有较高的安全性。 Objective To explore and analyze the clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic combined surgery in the treatment of patients with intestinal adhesion and appendicitis.Methods Our hospital were treated 120 cases of adhesions appendicitis patients from May 2014 to May 2015. They were divided into conventional treatment group and combined treatment group,each with 60 cases. Conventional treatment group received conventional open surgery, combined therapy group received laparoscopic appendectomy joint enterolysis,then contrasted the two clinical results.ResultsThe combined treatment group compared with the conventional treatment group,had shorter surgery time,reduced the amount of bleeding and bowel recovery time, and had shorter hospital stays,P〈 0.05. Complications occurred in conventional treatment group was 16.67%,the incidence of complications in the combined treatment group was 3.33%,the incidence of complications in the combined treatment group was significantly lower than the conventional treatment group,P〈 0.05.ConclusionFor patients with appendicitis adhesions using laparoscopic appendectomy joint enterolysis treatment can achieve significant therapeutic effect,not only reduce the surgical trauma, but also has high security.
出处 《中国卫生标准管理》 2015年第24期56-58,共3页 China Health Standard Management
关键词 腹腔镜 肠粘连 阑尾炎 疗效 安全性 Laparoscopy Adhesions Appendicitis Efficacy Safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献19

  • 1王育和,刘家峰,徐大华,李非,孙家邦.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗穿孔性阑尾炎的比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(12):1184-1185. 被引量:78
  • 2白永勤.腹腔镜粘连松解术治疗粘连性肠梗阻105例[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(5):461-462. 被引量:19
  • 3许峰峰,肖隆斌,吴文辉,张兴伟,龙硕,谭进富,谭敏.慢性阑尾炎腹腔镜与开腹手术疗效比较[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2007,10(4):359-361. 被引量:35
  • 4黄志强,李荣.现代腹腔镜外科学[M].天津:天津科学技术出版社,2006:455.
  • 5夏穗生.现代腹腔外科学[M].武汉:湖北科学技术出版社,2007:333.
  • 6Himal HS. Minimally invasive (laparoscopie) surgery [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2002, 16(12): 1647-1652.
  • 7Cheu CS, Chert W J, Cheng CK, et al. Failure analysis of broken ped- icle screws on spinal instrumentation [J-]. Medical Engineering & Physics, 2005, 27(6): 487-496.
  • 8Kr~ihenbiihl L. Schafer M, Kuzinkovas V, et al. Experimental study of adhesion formation in open and Laparoscopic fundoplication [J]. British Journal of Surgery, 1998, 85(6): 826-830.
  • 9Szomstein S, Lo Menzo E. Laparoscopic Lysis of adhesions [J]. World J Surg, 2006, 30(4): 535-540.
  • 10Zerey M, Sechrist CW, Kercher KW, et al. Laparoscopic manage- ment of adhesive small bowel obstruction [J]. Am J Surg, 2007, 194 (6): 882-887.

共引文献40

同被引文献43

引证文献6

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部