摘要
目的总结对比固定义齿与活动义齿用于牙周病修复治疗的临床疗效和差异。方法选择2008年1月—2013年12月期间佛山市顺德区第一人民医院收治的55例牙周病患者,随机分为实验组和对照组。对照组25例采用固定义齿修复治疗,实验组30例采用活动义齿修复治疗。观察记录两组患者的基牙出血指数以及患者治疗满意度。结果实验组治疗后的出血指数(1.02±0.39)明显低于对照组治疗后的出血指数(1.51±0.63),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);实验组的治疗满意度93.33%明显高于对照组治疗满意度72.00%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论采用活动义齿修复治疗牙周病的临床疗效好,患者满意度高,值得临床推广应用。
Objective To sum up the clinical effect and difference between the fixed denture and removable denture in the treatment of periodontal disease.Methods 55 patients with periodontal disease were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group in our hospital from January 2008 December to 2013.In the control group, 25 cases were treated with fixed partial denture, and 30 cases in the experimental group were treated with removable partial denture.Observation of the two groups of patients with bleeding index and patients treated with satisfaction.Results In the experimental group after the treatment of bleeding index (1.02+0.39) was significantly lower than that in treatment group and control group after the bleeding index ( 1.51 +0.63 ) , and the difference is statistically significant ( P <0.05 ); experimental group of treatment satisfaction 93.33% was significantly higher than that of the control group treatment satisfaction 72.00% were statistically significant ( P<0.05 ) . Conclusion The clinical effect of the treatment of periodontal disease with removable partial denture is good, the patient satisfaction is high, it is worthy of clinical application.
出处
《广东微量元素科学》
CAS
2015年第9期64-66,共3页
Trace Elements Science
关键词
固定义齿
活动义齿
牙周病修复治疗
临床疗效
fixed denture
removable denture
treatment of periodontal disease
clinical curative effect
