摘要
《海峡两岸共同打击犯罪及司法互助协议》(以下简称《南京协议》)构建了两岸刑事调查取证协助机制,但该机制并不完善。影响其成效的因素主要有两个,一是两岸刑事调查取证协助主体的复杂性,主要表现为协助主体的多层性和协助主体职权的复杂性;二是两岸刑事证据制度的差异性,主要表现为传闻证据的差异、非法证据排除规则的差异、证人保护的差异、证人出庭做证义务的差异等。为深化两岸刑事调查取证协助应着力解决三个问题:一是协助程序的简化。体现为协助环节的简化和协助方式的简化。二是证据的补强。包括派员调查取证和远程视频取证。三是两岸法律制度的弥合。
Cross-strait Joint Fight against Crime and Mutual Legal Assistance Agreement （here- inafter referred to as the＂Nanjing Agreement＂） constructed a cross-strait criminal investigation assistance mechanism, which is not perfect now and is affected by two main factors： One is the complexity of the subject of investigation assistance, which mainly reflected in the muhilayer of the assistance subject and its complex power of. The other one is differences between the cross-straits criminal evidence system, which mainly in the differences in hearsay evidence, the exclusionary rule, witnesses protection, obligation of witnesses testifying and so on. Three problems should be solved in order to improve the efficiency of criminal investigation in two sides： First, to simplify the assistance program, which mainly in the simplification of assistance link and pattern. Second, evidence complementing, including the investigation of sending a man and sent a remote video. Third, bridge the differences between the cross-strait legal systems.
出处
《净月学刊》
2015年第4期56-60,共5页
Journal of Jilin Public Security Academy
基金
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目<海峡两岸警务合作面临的困境及对策研究>阶段性成果
项目编号:1112113006
关键词
海峡两岸
刑事调查取证
协助机制
cross-strait
criminal investigation
assistance mechanism
