摘要
土地的开发利用应遵循既定的分区规划,若刻板执行分区规划给财产所有人造成实际的困难或不必要的困难时,财产所有人可以申请分区变更。但由财产所有人自己制造的困难、不具有特殊性的困难、财产所有人自身的困难、未实现最大经济效率的困难以及非因适用分区规划产生的困难,均不能构成认定困难规则中的"困难"。美国法上困难规则的司法认定标准,对于完善中国城市规划分区变更认定标准具有重要的启示意义。
The development and utilization of land should defer to the established zoning plan; however, the owner of property has the right to apply for zoning variance if practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships will be caused when the plan is executed strictly. But the difficulties or hardships cannot be regarded as the ones defined by the Rule of Hardship it they are made by the owner of the property, or they are not particular, or they are made by the owner＇s personal circumstance, or they are understood as cannot achieve the max economic interests, or they are not created when the zoning plan is applied. The judicial standards of the Rule of Hardship in American law have great significance in improving the zoning variance system in China.
出处
《城市规划》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第9期59-63,86,共6页
City Planning Review
基金
司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目"美国法上作为征收理由的公用判断标准"(14SFB2009)资助
2015年度厦门大学人文社会科学"校长基金.创新团队"项目(20720151038)
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助
关键词
分区规划
分区变更
困难规则
zoning plan
zoning variance
rule of hardship
