期刊文献+

慢病管理团队主导的高血压控制效果评价 被引量:16

Evaluation of chronic disease management team-led hypertension management
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价慢病管理团队主导的高血压管理对患者血压控制状况、疾病相关花费及生活质量的影响。方法采用随机对照研究,共纳入高血压患者538名。其中由慢病管理团队管理的高血压患者为266例(团管组),平均年龄为62.8岁;常规门诊专科医师管理的患者为272例(常管组),平均年龄为64.5岁。团管组干预内容包括与患者互动式沟通完成治疗及生活方式调整方案的商讨和确立,定期随访血压控制的状况及对依从性障碍问题的解决。常管组干预的内容包括患者治疗方案制定、健康教育及治疗过程中的血压控制水平的计划性随访。结果随访结束时,团管组患者血压控制率达92.9%,而常管组则为75%(P<0.001);团管组收缩压和舒张压的改善程度均大于常管组(分别为P=0.006及0.008)、更少的疾病相关经济花费分别为[(61.4±30.6)元及(75.4±39.1)元,P<0.006]和更好的慢病管理服务体验及更高的生活质量。结论慢病团队主导的慢病管理模式,通过提供更加个体化的治疗方案,可有效地改善高血压患者的血压控制状况、减少疾病相关的经济费用和改善患者的生活质量。 Objective To assess blood pressure(BP)control status,disease-related economic costs as well as quality of life of patients with hypertension managed by Chronic disease management team vs routine clinic Interview.Methods 538 patients were randomly assigned to chronic disease management team-Led group(n=266,mean age 62.8years)or routine clinic Interview group(n=272,mean age 64.5years).Interventions of the chronic disease management team-led included discussion and development therapeutic and lifestyle modification plan by interaction with patients,regular follow-up for blood pressure control and problem solving to address barriers to adherence.Measures of routine clinic interview group included development of treatment,healthy Education and planned follow-up for blood pressure control status.Results Compared with routine clinic interview group,patients in the Chronic disease management team-led group had more satisfactory blood pressure control rate(92.9%75%,P〈0.001)and blood pressure level and,less disease-related economic costs(RMB$61.4±30.675.4±39.1,P〈0.006)and better delivered chronic disease care services as well as quality of life.Conclusions Interventions delivered by Chronic disease management team using individualized treatment regimens can be an effective approach to improve blood pressure control in hypertensive patients,reduce disease related economic costs and improve the quality of life of patients.
出处 《西部医学》 2015年第10期1522-1525,共4页 Medical Journal of West China
基金 四川省卫生厅科研课题(100335) 四川省南充市科技基金项目(2010SF18)
关键词 慢病管理团队 专科护士 高血压 血压控制率 生活质量 Chronic disease management team Specialist nurse hypertension Blood pressure control rate Quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Davidson, M. Effect of nurse-directed diabetes care in a minori- ty population[J]. Diabetes Care, 2003, 26(8), 2281-2287.
  • 2Fireman B, Bartlett J, Selby J. Can disease management reduce health care costs by improving quality l-J]. Health Affairs, 2004, 23(2) :63-75.
  • 3杜晓秋,张涛,陆沿竹.血脂异常的社区综合管理效果评价[J].西部医学,2011,23(12):2437-2439. 被引量:2
  • 4Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness[J]. Milbank Q, 1996(6), 74:511-544.
  • 5Clark CE, Smith LF, Taylor RS, et al. Nurse-led interventions used to improve control of high blood pressure in people with di-abetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. 2011, 28(3) :250-261.
  • 6Walsh JM, McDonald KM, Shojania KG, et al. provement strategies for hypertension management review[J]. Med Care, 2006(5), 44:646-657.
  • 7Diabet Med Quality im- a systematic Mundinger MO, Kane RL, Lenz ER, et al. Primary care out- comes in patients treated by nurse practitioners or physicians: a randomized trial[J]. JAMA, 2000, 283 (1):59-68.
  • 8Andersen UO, Simper AM, Ibsen H, etal. Treating the hyper- tensivepatient in a nurse-led hypertension clinic [J]. Blood Press, 2010, 19(3) :182-187.
  • 9Barley EA, Waiters P, Haddad M, et al. The UPBEAT nurse- delivered personalized care intervention for people with coronary heart disease who report current chest pain and depression: a randomised controlled pilot study[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(6): 113-117.
  • 10Odnoletkova I, Goderis G, Nobels F,et al. Nurse-led telecoach- ing of people with type 2 diabetes in primary care: rationale, de- sign and baseline data of a randomized controlled trial[J]. BMC Fam Pract, 2014, 15(7) :24-29.

二级参考文献5

共引文献1

同被引文献143

引证文献16

二级引证文献108

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部