期刊文献+

患者安全文化评价中文版中安全态度问卷的信效度分析 被引量:4

Evaluation of Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version Safety Attitudes Questionnaire Using to Assess Patient Safety Culture
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价中文版安全态度调查问卷的信度和效度,验证其在我国文化背景下适用的科学性。方法:对362名医务人员进行问卷调查,评价问卷的信度和效度。结果:中文版安全态度调查问卷总的Cronbach’sα系数为0.940;各条目与所属维度相关系数范围0.511-0.897,各维度与问卷总分相关系数范围0.384-0.852,且均具有统计学意义(P<0.001);全部36个条目的因子载荷范围为0.164-0.907(P<0.01),其中3个条目的载荷小于0.400,多因子分析结果 CMIN/DF=2.305,RMR=0.073,GFI=0.832,AGFI=0.801,CFI=0.907,RMSEA=0.060,各拟合指数在可被接受水平。结论:初步验证了中文版安全态度调查问卷具有极好的信度和可接受的效度,可用于我国医务人员患者安全文化测评。 Objective: To evaluate the reliability and validity of Chinese Version Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) and verify the appli- cability on the background of China. Methods: Totally 362 medical staffs were surveyed with the questionnaire on patient safety culture. The re- suits were used to assess the reliability and validity of Chinese Version SAQ. Results: The Cronbach 's α coefficient of the questionnaire was 0. 940 ; the range of Pearson correlation coefficient between each item and its dimension was 0.511 - 0. 897 (P 〈0. 001 ), and that between each dimension and questionnaire score was 0.384 - 0. 852 ( P 〈 0.001 ) ; factor loadings to all 36 items were 0. 164 - 0.907 ( P 〈 0.01 ) with 3 factor loadings less than 0.400. The multiple factor analysis results showed CMIN/DF = 2. 305, RMR = 0. 073, GFI = 0. 832, AGFI = 0. 801, CFI =0. 907, RMSEA =0. 060, and all index were acceptable. Conclusion: Chinese Version SAQ was preliminarily proved to have excellent reliability and acceptable validity. It can be applied to assessing patient safety culture of medical staffs in China.
出处 《医学与社会》 2015年第10期57-60,共4页 Medicine and Society
基金 北京市哲学社会科学规划研究基地项目 编号为13JDSHA004
关键词 安全态度调查问卷 患者安全文化 信度 效度 SAQ Patient Safety Culture Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Kaya S, Barsbay S, Karabulut E. The Turkish version of the safety attitudes questionnaire: psychometric properties and baseline data [ J ]. Qual Saf Health Care, 2010,19 ( 6 ) : 572 - 577.
  • 2Smits M, Christiaans - Dingelhoff I, Wagner C, et al. The psychometric properties of the ' Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture' in Dutch hospitals [ J ]. BMC Health Serv Res ,2008 ( 8 ) :230.
  • 3Zimmermann Natalie, Kung Kaspar, Sereika Susan, et al. Assessing the safety attitudes questionnaire (SAQ), Ger- man language version in Swiss university hospitals - a vali- dation study[ J]. BMC Health Serv Res,2013:131.
  • 4Colla JB, Bracken AC, Kinney LM, et al. Measuring patient safety climate: a review of surveys [ J ]. Qual Saf Health Care,2005,14(5) :364 - 366.
  • 5Sexton John, Helmrelch Robert, Nellands Torsten, et al. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire : psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research [ J ]. BMC Health Serv Res,2006(6) :44.
  • 6Hutchinson A, Cooper KL, Dean JE, et al. Use of a safety climate questionnaire in UK health care: factor structure, reliability and usability [ J ]. Qual Saf Health Care, 2006,15(5) :347 -353.
  • 7Deilkas ET, Hofoss D. Psychometric properties of the Nor- wegian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), Genetic version ( Short Form 2006 ) [ J ]. 2008 (8):191.
  • 8Chaboyer W, Chamberlain D, Hewson - Conroy K, et al. CNE article: safety culture in Australian intensive care u- nits: establishing a baseline for quality improvement [ J ]. Am J Crit Care,2013,22(2) :93 - 102.
  • 9Henry L, Hunt SL, Kroetch M, et al. Evaluation of patient safety culture : a survey of clinicians in a cardiovascular op- erating room [ J ]. Innovations (Phila), 2012,7 ( 5 ) : 328 - 337.
  • 10Lee WC, Wung HY, Liao HH, et al. Hospital safety culture in Taiwan: a nationwide survey using Chinese version Safety Attitude Questionnaire [ J ]. BMC Health Serv Res, 2010 (10) :234.

二级参考文献32

  • 1李灿,辛玲.调查问卷的信度与效度的评价方法研究[J].中国卫生统计,2008,25(5):541-544. 被引量:476
  • 2王海军,徐克静.问卷调查中的信度和效度问题[J].中国健康教育,1994,10(11):21-23. 被引量:27
  • 3吴明隆.SPSS统计应用实务[M].北京:科学出版社,2003.12-61.
  • 4Feng X, Bobay K, Weiss M. Patient safety culture in nur- sing: a dimensional concept analysis[J]. J Adv Nurs,2008, 63(3) .. 310-319.
  • 5Rockville W,Sorra J S, Nieva V F. Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture [R/OL]. (2004-09). [2014-07- 19]. http..//www, ahrq. gov/professionals/quality-pa- tient-safety/patientsafetyculture/hospital/resources/hos- pcult, pdf.
  • 6Mardon R E, Khanna K, Sorra J, et al. Exploring rela- tionships between hospital patient safety culture and ad- verse events[J]. J Patient Saf, 2010,6 (4) : 226-232.
  • 7Shekelle P G, Wachter R M, Pronovost P J, et al. Ma- king health care safer II: an updated critical analysis of the evidence for patient safety practices [J]. Evid Rep Technol Assess,2013(211) .. 1-945.
  • 8Pronovost P, Sexton B. Assessing safety culture: guide- lines and recommendations[J]. Qual Saf Health Care, 2005,14(4) .. 231-233.
  • 9Colla J B, Bracken A C, Kinney L M, et al. Measuring patient safety climate: a review of surveys[J]. Qual Saf Health Care, 2005,14(5) : 364-366.
  • 10Sexton J B, Helmreich R L, Neilands T B, et al. The safety attitudes questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research [J]. BMCHealth Serv Res, 2006,6 : 44.

共引文献90

同被引文献36

引证文献4

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部