期刊文献+

命名的象征力量与国际争端中的主权想象 被引量:3

The Symbol Strength of Naming and the Sovereign Imagination in the International Disputes
原文传递
导出
摘要 近几年中国频繁和周边国家爆发"命名冲突"。然而学界对于"命名"在中国国家战略中的地位,一直认识不足。部分政府官员、媒体和学者往往容易把命名看成现实的标签,而忽视了命名建构现实作用。其实自19世纪以来,以中国"天下观"主导的国际文化秩序遭受到西方主导的殖民扩张主义和民族主义冲击后,"命名"往往成为周边国家"去中国化",宣示主权的手段之一。而在命名"去中国化"过程中,中国和周边国家关于主权的想象也一直处在一种对中国不利的动态变迁之中。当今条件下,如何有效地管控命名行为及其背后的国际争端,实现命名"再中国化",建构国际社会于我有利的主权想象,也许是值得研究的重要课题。 The naming conflicts between China and his neighboring countries have greatly increased in the recent years. However, the significance of the naming's strategic position has not received enough attention and fair judgement. Some government officials, the media presses and scholars consider naming as the label of reality, ignoring that naming can construct reality. In fact, "TianXia View" of China has been impacted by Western colonial expansion and nationalism since the 19th century. Then many neighboring countries of China began to declare their sovereignty through "desinification" of naming. Meanwhile the Chinese people have gradually lost their sovereign imagination about the disputed areas. So maybe those important topics like how can China effectively control the naming behavior, sinify naming again, and construct the international sovereign imagination worth further study.
作者 甘莅豪
出处 《国际新闻界》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第9期6-22,共17页 Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication
基金 国家社科基金项目"突发事件政府应急话语技术与形象修复策略研究"(项目编号:13CXW040)的阶段性成果~~
关键词 命名 领土 建构论 去中国化 再中国化 Naming, territory, theory of construction, desinification, sinify again
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

二级参考文献105

共引文献133

同被引文献31

引证文献3

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部