全椎板切除脊柱内固定对老年退行性腰椎管狭窄症患者功能恢复的效果评价被引量：4

The effect of laminectomy spine fixation on restore function in treatment of patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis

原文传递

导出

摘要目的：探讨全椎板切除脊柱内固定对老年退行性腰椎管狭窄症患者功能恢复的效果。方法收集退行性腰椎管狭窄症患者60例，按照简单随机法分成观察组及对照组各30例。观察组采用全椎板切除减压联合脊柱内固定术，对照组采用部分椎板切除减压联合脊柱内固定术，观察其治疗效果。结果与术前比较，两组术后神经功能恢复情况进行分析，在 A 级、B 级、D 级及 E 级方面差异有统计学意义（χ2＝6．392、6．203、7．213、7．382，均 P ＜0．05）。与对照组比较，观察组在 A 级、B 级、D 级及 E 级方面差异有统计学意义（χ2＝6．012、6．102、7．124、7．203，均 P ＜0．05）。与术前比较，患者术后3个月的椎管直径为（17．2±3．1）mm，末次随访时为（16．8±2．7）mm，差异有统计学意义（t ＝6．391、7．692，均 P ＜0．05）。患者术后3个月、末次随访椎管直径差异无统计学意义（t ＝0．592，P ＞0．05）。结论手术是治疗老年退行性腰椎管狭窄最为有效的治疗方式。通过后路椎间盘镜采用椎管减压措施，再次进行椎弓根内固定、椎间植骨融合方式，预后良好，值得临床推广使用。 Objective To investigate the effect of laminectomy spine fixation on restore function in treatment of patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.Methods 60 patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis were selected and divided into the observation group and control group with 30 patitents respectively.Patietns in the observation group were taken with laminectomy decompression of spinal fixation,while patients in the control were treated with part laminectomy decompression of spinal fixation.The treatment effect was observed.Results Compared with the preoperative data,postoperative neurologic recovery of the two groups were analyzed in A grade,B grade,D and E grade level terms after comparison analysis,the difference was statistically significant （χ2 =6.392,6.203, 7.213,7.382,all P 〈0.05）.Compared with the patients of the control group,comparison analysis of A grade,B grade,D and E grade level terms in the patients of the observation group had a statistically significant difference （χ2 =6.012,6.102,7.124,7.203,all P 〈0.05）.Compared with the preoperative data,the resuts of postoperative 3 months showed canal diameter of （17.2 ±3.1）mm,at last follow -up was （16.8 ±2.7）mm.After a comparative analysis,the differences were statistically significant （t =6.391,7.692,all P 〈0.05）.Patients after three months,the diameter of the spinal canal comparative analysis of last follow -up,the difference was not statistically significant （t =0.592,P 〉0.05 ）.Conclusion Surgery is the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis disease the most effective treatment.Measures taken by posterior spinal decompression discectomy,again with pedicle fixation and interbody fusion approach,can make a good prognosis,and isworthy of clinical use.

作者邓红军

机构地区江山贝林医院骨科

出处《中国基层医药》 CAS 2015年第19期2993-2995,共3页 Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy

关键词脊柱内固定椎管狭窄腰椎 Laminectomy spinal fixation Spinal stenosis Lumbar vertebrae

分类号 R687.3 [医药卫生—骨科学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献14

1Issack PS, Cunningham ME, Pumberger M, et al. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis : evaluation and management [ J ]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2012,20(8 ) :527-535.
2Kreiner DS, Shaffer WO, Baisden JL, et al. An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (update) [ J]. Spine J,2013,13 (7) :734- 743.
3Leonardi MA, Zanetti M, blin K. Extent of Decompression and In- cidence of Postoperative Epidural Hematoma Among Different Techniques of Spinal Decompression in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis [ J ]. J Spinal Disord Teeh, 2013,26 ( 8 ) : 407- 414.
4Battie MC, Ortega - Alonso A, Niemelainen R, et al. Brief Re- port:Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Is a Highly Genetic Condition Partly Mediated by Disc Degeneration [ J ]. Arthr Rheumatol, 2014,66 (12) :3505-3510.
5傅智轶,史建刚,贾连顺.有限椎板切除减压与全椎板切除减压内固定术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的疗效对比(英文)[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2014,22(15):1347-1352. 被引量：29
6乐锦波,杜远立,梁杰,向选平.半椎板切除减压术与全椎板切除椎间融合内固定术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的疗效比较[J].实用医院临床杂志,2014,11(5):199-200. 被引量：3
7孟凡志,程俊杰.经棘突、椎板截骨腰椎管成形术治疗腰椎管狭窄[J].中国基层医药,2011,18(20):2797-2798. 被引量：3
8Houten JK, Nasser R. Symptomatic progression of degenerative scoliosis after decompression and limited fusion surgery for lum- bar spinal stenosis [ J ]. J Clin Neurosci ,2013,20 (4) :613-615.
9Davis R J, Errico TJ, Bae H, et al. Decompression and Coflex in- terlaminar stabilization compared with decompression and instru- mented spinal fusion for spinal stenosis and low-grade degenera- tive spondylolisthesis:two-year resuhs from the prospective, ran- domized, multicenter, Food and Drug Administration Investiga- tional Device Exemption trial [ J ]. Spine, 2013,38 ( 18 ) : 1529- 1539.
10Kovacs FM, Urrfitia G, Alarc6n JD. Surgery versus conservative treatment for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis : a systematic re- view of randomized controlled trials [ J ]. Spine, 2011,36 ( 20 ) : E1335-E1351.

二级参考文献60

1夏英鹏,徐天同,张黎龙,杜文君,田成瑞.氟骨症颈椎管狭窄症的手术治疗[J].中国地方病学杂志,2005,24(1):85-86. 被引量：9
2田慧中,王以进,李永年.后部结构切除对腰椎稳定性影响的实验研究[J].中华骨科杂志,1994,14(9):557-560. 被引量：158
3刘洋,石永常,林欣.后路减压内固定治疗腰椎管狭窄57例远期疗效观察[J].实用医院临床杂志,2010,7(4):140-142. 被引量：9
4阮狄克,何勍,丁宇,侯黎升,王德利.单纯减压治疗伴Ⅰ度退变滑脱的腰椎管狭窄症的中远期疗效分析[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(1):11-14. 被引量：38
5陈培忠,云中杰,高红旭,马爱华,王玉涛,李亨祥,赵力军.山东省嘉祥县地方性氟中毒流行病学调查研究[J].中国地方病学杂志,2006,25(5):537-540. 被引量：13
6王福全骆燕禧黄公怡等.腰椎管狭窄症手术治疗及其远期疗效[J].中华骨科杂志,1990,10(1):97-97.
7卢微.腰椎椎板切除术后腰椎不稳定性的研究概况[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,1993,8(4):279-279.
8Lawson KJ, Malycky JL, Berry JL,et al. Lamina repair and replacement to control laminectomy membrance formation in dogs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ,1991,16(6 Suppl) :222-226.
9Houten JK, Cooper PR. Laminectomy and posterior cervical platingfor multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of theposterior longitudinal ligament: effects on cervical alignment, spinalcord compression, and neurological outcome. Neurosurgery, 2003,52(5): 1081-1088.
10Heller JG, Edwards CC II, Murakami H, et al. Laminoplasty versuslaminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an inde-pendent matched cohort analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2001, 26(12):1330-1336.