摘要
《侵权责任法》第87条规定的加害人不明时损失分担规则是我国法的一大创造,在世界各国立法例中罕见,在学术界曾经引发过巨大争议。对现有案例的分析已经证明,法官对该规则的理解不一,有扩大和类推适用倾向。因此,在司法实践中,应当对该条在目的上、对象上、内容上和范围上予以限缩,以最大限度地避免该条引发的负面影响,并达到从解释论的角度改良该条之目的。
The rule of share of loss in the case of unclearness of author of injury in Article 87 of Tort Law is a great creation of Chinese law worldwide,which once caused great argument among Chinese scholars. The analysis of present cases proves that there is disagreement in the understanding of this article among Chines judges and the trend of enlargment and analogy exists. Therefore,in the practice of legal process,the limitation of rule should be realized in four aspects： goal,object,content and field.Only in this way can we avoid the negative effect of this article and improve it from the point of explanation.
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第11期11-18,共8页
Hebei Law Science
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目<新农村建设视阈下农民社会主义核心价值观培育与践行研究>(14YJA710024)资助
关键词
侵权法
加害人不明
损失分担规则
侵权责任
tort law
unclearness of author of injury
rule of share of loss
tort liability
