摘要
传统冲突法理论在"冲突法为何存在"问题上有一定的解释力,但仍存在视阈度狭隘、时空普适度不够及理论工具受限等不足,有待弥合。建构主义理论指向的"多元行为体互动构建而成的国际社会"为冲突法"协调多元主体利益"提供了功能场域;其"国家行为体中心论"及"规范的建构作用"为理解"回家去趋势"的客观性提供新的理路;该理论对"文化身份"的阐发解释了为何在已有实体规则存在的领域仍可能有冲突法规范的存在,从而展现了冲突法维护法律文化的独特本质。在建构主义视域下,冲突法是交融"协调多元利益和维护文化身份"二者功能的最佳途径。
The traditional theory of conflict law could explain the question of ＂why there is conflict law＂to a certain extent. While there still exit some limits with explanation such as narrow perspective,lacking universal on time and space and inadequate theory tools,etc. Constructivism which pointing to ＂the international community is constructed from the interaction of pluralistic behavior body＂provides the function field for the conflict of laws to coordinate the interests of the multiple subjects; Its＂state-centric approach＂and ＂the construction role of specification ＂do good to understand the trend of ＂going home＂in conflict law; The ＂cultural identity theory＂in Constructivism explains why there still exist conflict rules in some fields of civil and commercial laws which is full of uniform substantive rules already. These show the conflict law ＇s unique nature to maintain the legal culture. In constructivist perspective,the conflict of laws is the best approach to combine with ＂coordinating the multiple interests in the national society＂and ＂maintaining cultural identity of the sovereign country＂together.
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第11期134-145,共12页
Hebei Law Science
基金
福建省教育厅人文社科B类课题<国际私法视域下国际法法理学具象研究>(JBS14035)
西南政法大学2013年度研究生科研创新计划项目<国际私法视域下国际法法理学具象研究>(2013XZYJS199)
关键词
冲突法
存在理据
建构主义
多元利益协调
文化身份与认同
conflict law
raison d＇etre constructivism
multiple interest coordination
cultural identity
