摘要
我国刑事涉案财物处置在司法实践中存在突出问题:为保障被害人的经济损失获得赔偿,侦查机关实施查封、扣押、冻结的范围存在扩大化倾向;侦查机关查封、扣押、冻结的涉案财产,人民检察院、人民法院无权直接解除;法院判决书中遗漏、概括没收的现象较为普遍;法院在作出判决时,将刑事没收转化为罚金刑,以规避其查证职责,并扩大了对涉案财产的剥夺范围。为解决上述问题,应在立法上对相关措施的对象范围、证据条件、举证责任、程序救济等作出具体规定。
China＇s way of disposal of property involved in criminal cases show major problems in the judicial practice. In order to guarantee economic compensation for victims, the investigating authorities tend to excessively expand the scope of close-down, seizure, and freezing of property involved. For the property disposed of by investigating authorities, the People＇s Procuratorate and the people＇s Court have no authority to directly suspend disposal. It is common for court verdicts to omit relevant disposal arrangement or prescribe disposal in too general terms. When the court in reaching its decision, the criminal forfeiture is turned into criminal fines in order to avoid its verification responsibilities, yet it expands the scope of deprivation for property involved. To solve these problems, we should make specific provisions in legislation to govern relevant measures, including the range of subjects, evidence condition, the burden of proof, and process relief.
出处
《江苏行政学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第6期127-132,共6页
The Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute
基金
美国福特基金会"中国刑事司法中经济性处分与制裁研究"项目(G66007365)
西南政法大学2012年引进人才科研项目(2012-XZRCXM004)的阶段性成果
关键词
涉案财物处置
刑事没收
扣押冻结
disposal of property involved in criminal cases
criminal forfeiture
seizure and freezing
