摘要
目的探讨AX-4280尿干化学分析仪(简称干化学法)、Sysmex UF1000-i全自动尿沉渣分析仪(简称UF1000-i)及Olympus CX21显微镜镜检法(简称镜检法)检测尿液红细胞、白细胞的临床应用价值。方法随机选取1 690份尿液标本,分别采用上述3种方法进行检测,并对结果进行比较分析。结果干化学法、UF1000-i、镜检法检测尿液红细胞(RBC)的阳性率分别为29.70%、25.03%和22.84%,检测尿液白细胞(WBC)的阳性率分别为27.04%、26.39%和24.08%。与镜检法结果比较,干化学法、UF1000-i检测尿液红细胞、白细胞结果差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论3种方法检测尿液红细胞、白细胞均有一定的优势和局限性,干化学法与UF1000-i不能完全取代镜检法,要根据临床诊断目的选择合适的检测方法,必要时可联合应用,以提高检测结果的准确性。
Objective To discuss the value of clinical application with AX-4280 urine dry chemistry method,Sysmex UF1000-i urinary sediment analyzer and Olympus CX21 microscopy for the detection of urine erythrocyte and lekocyte. Methods Randomly selecting 1 690 urine specimens,detection was conducted using the three methods,and the results were compared for analysis. Results The positive rates of urine erythrocyte,respectively using urine dry chemistry method,UF1000-i and microscopy,were 29. 70%,25. 03% and 22. 84% respectively,in leukocyte which were 27. 04%,26. 39% and 24. 08% respectively. Compared with the microscopy examination method,the detection results,with the urine dry chemistry method and UF1000-i,of urine erythrocyte and leukocyte showed statistical insignificance on the differences（ P〈0. 05）. Conclusion The three methods have certain advantages and limitations in the detection of erythrocyte and leukocyte,the urine dry chemistry method and UF1000-i cannot completely replace the microscopy method,according to the clinical diagnosis of purpose to choose the appropriate testing method,joint application when necessary,in order to improve the accuracy of the test results.
出处
《中国卫生检验杂志》
CAS
2015年第20期3507-3508,3511,共3页
Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology
关键词
红细胞
白细胞
尿沉渣分析仪
干化学分析仪
显微镜镜检
Erythrocyte
Leukocyte
Urinary sediment analyzer
Urine dry chemistry method
Microscopy examination
