期刊文献+

右美托咪定对老年患者全身麻醉拔管质量及苏醒时间的影响 被引量:3

Effects of dexmedetomidine on quality of extubation and duration of recovery in elderly patients undergoing general anesthesia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨右美托咪定对老年患者全身麻醉拔管质量及苏醒时间的影响。方法全身麻醉下行择期胃癌根治术老年患者60例随机均分为四组:D1、D2和D3组术中分别静脉泵注右美托咪定0.1、0.2和0.4μg·kg-1·h-1至术毕前30min;C组未予右美托咪定泵注作为对照。记录拔管质量评分、自主呼吸恢复时间、呼之睁眼时间、拔管时间和定向力恢复时间。结果 D2、D3组拔管质量评1分(拔管平稳,无呛咳)的人数为8例和9例,多于C组的2例和D1组的3例(P<0.01)。与C组、D1组和D2组相比,D3组自主呼吸恢复时间、呼之睁眼时间、拔管时间及定向力恢复时间均延长(P<0.05或P<0.01)。结论全身麻醉术中泵注右美托咪定0.2μg·kg-1·h-1可明显提高老年患者拔管质量。 Objective To investigate the effects of dexmedetomidine on the quality of extubation and duration of recovery in elderly patients undergoing general anesthesia.Methods Sixty elderly patients scheduled for radical gastric cancer surgery under general anesthesia were equally and randomly divided into 4groups.Groups of D1,D2 and D3 were continuous intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine 0.1,0.2and 0.4μg·kg^-1·h^-1 from the beginning to 30 minutes before the end of surgery.Group C did not infuse dexmedetomidine as the control.The extubation quality score and the times of spontaneous breathing recovery,eye opening at request,tracheal extubation and orientation regaining were recorded.Results The numbers of patients with extubation quality score of one point(extubated stably without coughing)were 8cases in group D2 and 9cases in group D3,which were more than 3cases in group D1 and 2cases in group C(P〈0.01).Compared with groups of C,D1 and D2,the times of spontaneous breathing recovery,eye opening at request,tracheal extubation and orientation regaining were longer in group D3(P〈0.05 or P〈0.01).Conclusion Continuous intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine 0.2μg·kg^-1·h^-1 during operation may significantly improve the extubation quality in elderly patients undergoing general anesthesia.
出处 《江苏医药》 CAS 2015年第21期2539-2541,共3页 Jiangsu Medical Journal
关键词 右美托咪定 气管拔管 老年 Dexmedetomidine Tracheal extubation Geriatrics
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献20

  • 1徐启明,李文硕.临床麻醉学[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2001:319-325
  • 2Glass PS,Bloom M,Kearse L, et al. Bispectral analysis measures sedation and memory effects of propofol,midazolam,isoflurane, and alfentanil in healthy volunteers [ J ]. Anesthesiology, 1997,86: 836 - 847
  • 3Myles PS, Hunt JO, Fletcher H, et al. Remifentanil, fentanyl, and cardiac surgery; double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of costs and out comes[J]. Aesth Analg,2002,95(4) :805 - 812
  • 4Mertens MJ ,Olofsen E,Engbers FH,et al. Propofol reduces perioperative remifentanil requirements in a synergistic manner: response surface modeling of perioperative remifentanil propofol interactions[J]. Anesthesiology,2003,99(10) :347 - 352
  • 5Davis PJ, Finkel JC, Orr RJ, et al. A randomised, double-blinded study of remifentanil versus fentanyl for tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy surgery in pediatric ambulatory surgical patients [ J ]. Anesth Analg,2000,90 (4) :863 - 871
  • 6Decker G, Millat B, Guillon F, et al. Laparoscopic splenectomy for benign and malignant hematologic disease: 35 consecutive cases [ J ]. World J Surg, 1998,22 ( 1 ) : 62 - 66
  • 7李明勇,王培山,张保军.瑞芬太尼丙泊酚全凭静脉麻醉在食道癌手术中的应用[J].医药论坛杂志,2007,28(12):100-101. 被引量:1
  • 8Marangoni MA, Castiglia YM, Medeiros TP. Analgesic effica- cy of dexmedetomidine as compared to sufentanil in intraperito- neal surgeries., comparative study. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 2005, 55 :19-27.
  • 9Aksu R, Akin A, Bicer C, et al. Comparison of the effects of dexrnedetomidine versus fentanyl on airway reflexes and he- modymic responses to tracheal extubation during rhinoplasty: A double-blind, randomized, controlled study. Current Thera- peutic Research, 2009,70:209-220.
  • 10Guler G, Akin A, Tosun Z, et al. Simple-dose dexmedetomi- dine attenuates airway and circulatory reflexes during extuba- tion. Aeta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2005,49: 1088-1091.

共引文献50

同被引文献41

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部