摘要
Since the implementation of the rules of the supplement and correction of the defective evidences, there are many problems in the practice. The actual investigations and researches also feedback that the judges also have a lot of problems in the face of the definition of the meaning of the defective evidences, the correction application, and the degree restrictions. Behind this reflects the contradiction between the stress of the prosecution organs in the criminal detection and the deepening of the resisting mechanism in the court. And the litigation structure of the ＂division of responsibilities among three authorities＂ and the trial mode of ＂the centralism of the book records of the cases＂ exacerbated this opposition. On the basis of clarifying the origin and the meanings of the defective evidences, the author of this paper analyzes the essence and its harm of the rule. Through the reflections of the problems existing in the practice, the author further defines the two types of the ＂defects＂ that shall not be allowed to correct.
