期刊文献+

外固定架治疗老年和青壮年桡骨远端骨折的临床疗效比较 被引量:1

The comparison of clinical effect of external fixation between young and elderly distal radius fracture patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析应用外固定架治疗老年人和青壮年桡骨远端骨折临床效果的差异。方法回顾分析我科2011-2013年应用外固定架治疗桡骨远端骨折的病例,根据年龄分为老年组(33例)和青壮年组(27例),分别对其术后功能、影像学结果进行随访。结果术后平均随访6.7个月,两组患者术后尺偏角、掌倾角、桡尺骨高度差、桡骨茎突高度均得到明显恢复,术后6个月老年组桡尺骨高度差与青壮年组比较,差异有统计学意义[(-0.06±2.8)mm vs.(1.2±2.3)mm,P<0.05]。两组患者术后Dienest腕关节功能评定差异无统计学意义。结论老年人桡骨远端骨折外固定架固定术后功能与青壮年无明显差异,桡骨高度虽然可以恢复正常范围,但是较青壮年存在差异。 Objective To analyze the clinical effect of external fixation for distal radius fracture in elderly or young patients. Methods From January 2011 to December 2013, 60 patients with distal radius fracture were treated with external fixation. They were divided into the elderly(n=33) or youth(n=27) group. The epidemiological data, radiological changes, fracture types, clinical outcomes, and complications were analyzed. Results Sixty patients were all followed up for 4 to 12 months, and the average follow-up time was 6.7 months. There were no differences between the two groups in the ulnar deviation, the palm dip angle, the height difference between ulna and radius, and radius styloid height. The function of wrist joint showed no difference between the two groups. Conclusion There is no difference in wrist joint function between elderly and youth group. The radius height of elderly can recover to normal range, but there are some differences for young patients.
出处 《北京医学》 CAS 2015年第11期1060-1063,共4页 Beijing Medical Journal
关键词 桡骨远端骨折 外固定架 老年 Distal radius fracture External fixation Elderly
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Chung KC, Spilson SV. The frequency and epidemiology of hand and forearm fractures in the United States[J]. J Hand Surg Am, 2001,26:908-915.
  • 2Singer BR, MeLauehlan GJ, Robinson CM, et al. Epidemiology of fi'aetures in 15,000 adults: the influence of age and gender[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1998, 80:243-248.
  • 3Grewal R, MacDermid JC. The risk of adverse outcomes in extra-ar- ticular distal radius fractures is increased with malalignment in pa- tients of all ages but mitigated in older patients[J]. J Hand Surg Am, 2007, 32:962-970.
  • 4姜保国,张殿英,傅中国,徐海林.老年桡骨远端骨折的治疗方法[J].中华骨科杂志,2004,24(11):645-648. 被引量:27
  • 5Jupiter J, Ring D, Weitzel P, et al. Surgical treatment of redisplaced fractures of the distal radius in patients older than 60 years[J]. J Hand Surg, 2002, 27:714-723.
  • 6Krishnan J, Wigg AE, Walker RW, et al. Intra-articular fractures of the distal radius: a prospective randomized controlled trial compar-ing static bridging and dynamic non-bridging external fixation[J]. J Hand Surg Br, 28:417-421.
  • 7Fu YC, Chien SH, Huang PJ, et al. Use of an external fixation com- bined with the buttress-maintain pinning method in treating commi- nuted distal radius fractures in osteoporotic patients[J]. J Trau- ma, 2006, 60:330-333.
  • 8Esposito J, Schemitsch EH, Saccone M, et al. External fixation ver- sus open reduction with plate fixation for distal radius fractures: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials[J]. Injury, 2013, 44: 409-416.
  • 9Wei DH, Poolman RW, Bhandari M. External fixation versus inter- nal fixation for unstable distal radius fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative clinical trials[J]. J Orthop Trau- ma, 2012, 26:386-394.
  • 10McKay SD, MacDermid JC, Roth JH, et al. Assessment of complica- tions of distal radius fractures and development of a complication checklist[J]. J Hand Surg Am, 2001, 26:916-922.

二级参考文献1

共引文献26

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部