摘要
目的探究基底节区脑出血应用保守治疗与手术治疗的疗效比较。方法选取我院2013年1月~2015年3月收治的基底节区高血压脑出血患者86例,根据患者治疗方式的不同分为手术组和保守组,比较两种治疗方式的临床疗效。结果治疗过程中手术组因为出血量增多而转开颅手术的患者有4例,保守组有3例,两组比较差异不具统计学意义（P〉0.05）;手术组肺部感染发生率、应急性溃疡发生率和平均住院时间均低于保守组,差异具有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论对于高血压引起的基底节区脑出血,采用手术治疗的临床疗效优于保守治疗,建议临床上首选手术治疗。
Objective To explore the clinical effect of conservative treatment and surgical treatment for cerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia region. Methods 86 patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage in our hospital from January 2013 to March 2015, cases of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage were selected, according to the different treatment methods, the clinical efficacy of the two treatments were compared. Results In the treatment group, there were 4 cases of patients with bleeding, 3 cases of conservative group, two groups were not statistically significant（P 0.05）; the incidence of pulmonary infection, the incidence and average length of hospital stay were significantly lower in the group, the difference was significant（P 0.05）. Conclusion The clinical curative effect of surgical treatment is better than conservative treatment for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.
出处
《中国卫生标准管理》
2015年第29期57-58,共2页
China Health Standard Management
关键词
基底节区
脑出血
保守治疗
手术治疗
Basal ganglia
Cerebral hemorrhage
Conservative treatment
Surgical treatment
