摘要
目的探讨痰液Xpert MTB/RIF法和涂片法检测结核分枝杆菌的结果及二者之间的符合程度。方法对103例临床诊断为肺结核的痰标本做Xpert MTB/RIF法和涂片法检测,并将结果进行比较。结果 103份痰液两种方法检测结核杆菌共有72例阳性,阳性率为69.9%,其中涂片法阳性65例,阳性率为63.1%,Xpert MTB/RIF法阳性61例,阳性率为59.2%;两种方法均阳性52例,均阴性30例,总的符合率达79.6%,有12例Xpert MTB/RIF法阴性涂片法阳性,有9例涂片法阴性Xpert MTB/RIF法阳性。二者比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。61例Xpert MTB/RIF法检测阳性对利福平耐药16例,耐药率为26.2%。结论两法检测结核分枝杆菌结果基本一致,二者相互结合更能提高检测阳性率。
Objective Explore the sputum which MTB/RIF and smear method the results of the detection of mycobacterium tuber-culosis and conform to the degree between the two. Methods 103 cases of clinical diagnosis for tuberculosis sputum specimens which MTB/RIF and smear method detection, and the results were compared. Results 103sputum of two kinds of methods to detect mycobacterium tuberculosis a total of 72 cases with positive, positive rate was 69.9%, the method of smear positive cases61ositive rate was 63.1%, which MTB positive 61 RIF method, positive rate is 59.2%; Two methods are positive for 52ses, 12cases which MTB/RIF negatie smear method is positive, there are 9 cases of smear positive negative which MTB/RIF method. The two compari-son, there was no significant difference （P﹥0.05）. Test positive for 61 cases which MTB/RIF method of rifampin resistance in 16 cases, resistant rate of 26.2%. Conclusion Flow method to detect mycobacterium tuberculosis results are basically identical, the two together can improve the detection positive rate.
出处
《中外医疗》
2015年第13期186-187,190,共3页
China & Foreign Medical Treatment
