期刊文献+

桃枝枯病花前田间化学防治效果研究 被引量:4

Control Efficacy in Field of Fungicides on Peach Shoot Blight before Flowering
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]明确桃枝枯病的防治适期。[方法]研究在早春花前2个不同时间喷施杀菌剂对桃枝枯病的田间防治效果。[结果]3月4日(45%咪鲜胺水乳剂900倍稀释液+50%多菌灵可湿性粉剂500倍稀释液)和3月19日(10%苯醚甲环唑水分散粒剂500倍稀释液+50%多菌灵可湿性粉剂500倍稀释液)连续2次喷施杀菌剂的防治效果最好,药后20 d对“湖景蜜露”和“柳条白凤”病枝的防效分别为73.8%和63.2%,药后50 d的防效分别为68.3%和62.9%;3月4日和3月19日仅1次防治有一定的效果,药后50 d防效为23.8%~39.7%。[结论]早春花前防治,特别是2次用药能有效控制桃枝枯病。 [ Objective ] The aim of this paper was to understand chemical control time against shoot blight of peach. [ Method ] Control efficacy of spraying fungicides on peach shoot blight at two different time before flowering period was tested in field trials. [Result] The spraying 45% Prochloraz EW (900-fold dilution) and 50% Carbendazim WP (500-fold dilution) on March 4, and 10% Difenoconazole WDG (500-fold dilu- tion) and 50% Carbendazim WP (500-fold dilution) on March 19 was the best against diseased twigs, with the control effects of 73.8% and 63.2% for peach variety "Hujingmilu" and "Liutiaobaifeng" 20 days after the spray two times, respectively, and with the effects of 68.3% and 62.9% 50 days after the spray. Furthermore, the control effects of fungicides only on March 4 and March 19 were 23.8% -39.7% 50 days after the spray. [ Conclusion] The study indicated that successive spraying of fungicides two times in early spring before flowering period has significant control effects against peach shoot blight in field.
出处 《安徽农业科学》 CAS 2015年第32期122-122,169,共2页 Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences
基金 现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-31-2-02) 江苏省农业科技自主创新资金项目[CX(14)2015 CX(15)1020] 江苏省无锡市农业科技支撑项目(CLE01N1410)
关键词 桃枝枯病 桃拟茎点霉 杀菌剂 防治时间 田间防效 Peach shoot blight Phomopsis amygdali Fungicides Chemical control time Control efficacy in the field
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1纪兆林,戴慧俊,金唯新,宋宏峰,张慧琴,金建芳,熊彩珍,徐敬友.桃枝枯病病原鉴定[J].扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2013,34(4):94-98. 被引量:15
  • 2LALANCETTE N,POLK D F.Estimating yield and economic loss from constriction canker of peach[J].Plant disease,2000,84(9):941-946.
  • 3TUSET J J,PORTILLA M T.Taxonomic status of Fusicoccum amygdali and Phomopsis amygdalina[J].Canadian journal of botany,1989,67:1275-1280.
  • 4纪兆林,戴慧俊,张慧琴,金建芳,熊彩珍,徐敬友.不同杀菌剂对桃枝枯病菌的毒力和田间防效[J].果树学报,2013,30(2):281-284. 被引量:11
  • 5戴慧俊,纪兆林,张天枢,等.桃枝枯病发生规律研究[C]//陈万全.生态文明建设与绿色植保:中国植物保护学会2014年学术年会.北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2014:98-104.
  • 6UDDIN W,STEVENSON K L,PARDO-SCHULTHEISS R A.Pathogenicity of a species of Phomopsis causing a shoot blight on peach in Georgia and evaluation of possible infection courts[J].Plant disease,1997,81(9):983.
  • 7SCHNABEL G,LALANCETTE N.Constriction canker management in peach[J].Southeastern regional peach newsletter,2003,3(3):6-11.

二级参考文献13

  • 1纪兆林,张建军,徐敬友,陈夕军,童蕴慧.抗腐霉利的灰葡萄孢菌株特性及其竞争能力[J].扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2007,28(2):65-68. 被引量:9
  • 2严东辉.桃树溃疡病侵染循环的研究[J].西南林学院学报,1989,9(2):153-161. 被引量:5
  • 3陈平,柳训才.咪鲜胺的应用概况及其残留检测研究[J].湖北农业科学,2007,46(3):478-480. 被引量:51
  • 4李红霞.苯并咪唑类杀菌剂的研究进展[A].中国植物病害化学防治研究(第3卷)[C].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2002.
  • 5LALANCETTE N, POLK D F. Estimating yield and economic lossfrom constriction canker of peach[J]. Plant Disease,2000,84(9): 941-946.
  • 6TUSET J J,PORTILLA M T. Taxonomic status of Fusicoccum amyg-dali and Phomopsis amygdalin[J]. Canadian Journal of Botany, 1989,67:1275-1280.
  • 7COPPING L G, BIRCHMORE R J, WRIGHT K, GODSON D H.Structure -activity relationships in a group of imidazole-1- carbox-amides[J]. Pesticide Science, 1984,15(3): 280-284.
  • 8LALANCETTE N,ROBISON D M. Effect of fungicides,applicationtiming,and canker removal on incidence and severity of constrictioncanker of peach[J]. Plant Disease, 2002, 86(7): 721-728.
  • 9SCHNABEL G, LALANCETTE N. Constriction canker managementin peach[J]. Southeastern Regional Peach Newsletter, 2003, 3(3):6-11.
  • 10UDDIN W, STEVENSON K L. Seasonal development of Phomopsisshoot blight of peach and effects of selective pruning and shoot de-biis management on disease incidence[J]. Plant Disease, 1998, 82(5):565-568.

共引文献19

同被引文献29

引证文献4

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部