期刊文献+

从布鲁克斯诉SSM医院案看专家证人的可采性审查

Admissibility review of expert witness from the case of Brooks V. SSM Health Care
原文传递
导出
摘要 专家证人证言的本质是一种意见证据,一旦失控就有干预司法权的危险。因此,法院在对待此类证据时需要慎之又慎。其中考察专家证人证言证据能力和证明力,建立一套行之有效的审查认定方法和程序至关重要。 The nature of the testimony of expert witness is an opinion evidence.If it is uncontrolled,the risk of interventions on jurisdiction will occur.Therefore,the court need be cautious to deal with such evidence.It is essential to establish an effective review and identified methods and procedures in order to examine competency and weight of evidence.
作者 邓虹
出处 《中国卫生法制》 2015年第6期27-30,共4页 China Health Law
基金 2013年度云南省哲学社会科学规划一般项目:中国刑事死因调查制度研究(YB2013042)
关键词 专家证人 证人证言 可采性 Expert witness Testimony Admissibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1Questions of whether the proffered expert opinion is supported by a sufficient factual or scientific foundation are questions of admissibility and must be raised by a timely objection or motion to strike. Washington, 897 S. W. 2d at 616.
  • 2The issue of what standard to apply to the admissibili- ty of scientific evidence is that it must have "wide sci- entific approval of its reliability" State v. Biddle, 599 S.W. 2d 182,19.
  • 3刘晓丹.科学证据可采性规则研究[J].证据科学,2012,20(1):21-32. 被引量:43

共引文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部