摘要
全国40县面板数据的分析表明,政府主导的"项目进村"目标与结果之间存在较为明显的"执行差距",反映了县乡政府及村级组织与乡村治理绩效具有较为复杂的内在关联。"项目进村"中县级财政投入公共服务的力度越大,越有利于缩小县域内的发展差距,乡镇一级的配套投入越多,则愈加限制治理绩效的改善,而村级组织的"一事一议"发挥了较为积极的作用。为此,加大中央和省级的财政支持力度,强化县乡政府和村级组织的治理能力,并动员、鼓励、引导和规范地方和基层组织自主性的充分发挥和有效衔接,拓展乡村地区的民主治理,是当前"项目制"制度安排下,乡村地区的公共服务水平和治理绩效得以可持续、稳定提升的可行之道。
The research based on 40 counties nationwide panel data indicates that, there is a significant ＇ implementation difference＇ between the result and aim in government-led ＇projects enter village＇ movement, reflecting a complex casual relationship among county/township governments, village organizations and local governance performance. Specifically, a county government put more investment in public service, there will be less developmental gap within a county; the more supporting input backed by towns and villages, the more restriction to the improvement of governance performance. However, the ＇one thing one discussion＇ program organized by villages exerts positive influence on local governance. Therefore, in order to improve the governance performance of county governments and village organizations, financial aid from both central government and local authorities should be strengthened. The autonomy of local organizations need be mobilized, guided and encouraged to extend democratic governance in rural areas. Under the background of current project system, this is the practical way for steadily improving public service level and governance performance.
出处
《华中师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第6期1-15,共15页
Journal of Central China Normal University:Humanities and Social Sciences
基金
国家社会科学基金项目"新型城镇化进程中人口-土地及其财政投入的均衡协调发展研究"(15BZZ045)
教育部哲学社会科学研究重大攻关项目"新时期我国农村综合改革研究"(12JZD023)
关键词
项目制
自主性
乡村基层
治理绩效
project system
autonomy
rural grassroots
governance performance
