摘要
目的:研究鼻声反射以及鼻阻力测量评估变应性鼻炎(AR)患者行鼻激发试验后的鼻腔通气状态,探讨AR患者在鼻激发试验后鼻通气功能的评估及意义。方法:应用鼻声反射仪对20例AR患者激发前及激发后1h和6h的鼻腔容积(NCV)、鼻阻力(NR)、鼻腔最小横截面积(NMCA)及最小横截面距前鼻孔距离(DCAN)进行测量,并进行统计学分析。结果:激发1hNCV、NR较激发前有改变(P<0.05),而NMCA、DCAN改变不明显(P>0.05),激发6hNCV、NR、NMCA、DCAN与激发前对比有统计学意义(P<0.05),激发6h与激发1h相比NCV、NR、DCAN差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),NMCA差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:AR患者在鼻腔激发试验后的鼻腔通气功能随时间明显降低。
Objective：To evaluate nasal ventilation in allergic rhinitis patients after nasal provocation with acoustic rhinometry.Method：Twenty AR cases were selected.Each one was assessed for the nasal cavity volumes（NCV）,nasal airway resistance（NR）,nasal minimal cross-section area（NMCA）and distance of nasal minimal cross-section area from nostril（DCAN）by using acoustic rhinometry before and after nasal provocation 1hour and6 hours later.The results were statistically analyzed.Result：After nasal provocation 1hour l later,NCV and NR had a significant difference compared with before nasal provocation（P〈0.05）,but NMCA and DCAN had no difference（P〉0.05）.After 6hours later,NCV,NR,NMCA and DCAN had a significant difference compared with before nasal provocation（P〈0.05）.NCV,NR,DCAN had a significant difference between 1hour later and 6hours later after provocation（P〈0.05）,while NMCA had no difference（P〉0.05）.Conclusion：The nasal ventilation in allergic rhinitis after nasal provocation had declined over time.
出处
《临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志》
CAS
北大核心
2015年第23期2038-2040,共3页
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head And Neck Surgery
基金
镇江市科技局(No:2001-010)
关键词
鼻炎
变应性
鼻阻力
鼻激发试验
rhinitis
allergic
nasal airway resistance
nasal provocation
