摘要
版权理论和实践面临的重要挑战之一,是如何判断非文字性相似构成实质性相似。在我国,一般认为判断实质性相似的标准主要包括"整体观感法"和"抽象分离法"。实质性相似的判断应协调思想表达二分法等原则,依据作品的独创性和作品属性来选择测试方法;比对的范围仅限于原告作品的独创性部分,相似程度的高低与独创性高低成反比。应根据作品的独创性和作品类型,选择具有不同注意力和知识技能的读者标准,以协调实质性相似、独创性与思想表达二分法等法律原则的关系。
One of the most challenging and debated questions in copyright infringement cases is non-literal similarity between plaintiffs and defendant's works,which focuses on the centrality of substantial similarity.Approaches to determine substantial similarity,including the ' total concept and feel' test and the ' analytic dissection' test,derive from US copyright law and are adopted by Chinese courts in different cases.However,the applicability of those approaches have not been clarified exactly in China The substantial similarity test shall consider the doctrine of copyright such as idea/expression dichotomy,according to the nature of works and the level of creativity for the existence of similarity of plaintiff's contribution.Thus,approaches to test substantial similarity are not exclusive under special cases,which should be displaced by audience standard,namely,different audience for different works are chose to test substantial similarity,in order to reach the harmony with copyright doctrine such as originality and idea/expression dichotomy.
出处
《法学家》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第6期37-50,174,共14页
The Jurist
基金
国家社科基金项目"全媒体时代著作权制度的应对和变革研究"(15BFX141)的阶段性成果
关键词
实质性相似
思想表达两分法
整体观感法
抽象分离法
读者标准
Substantial Similarity
Idea/Expression Dichotomy
Total Concept and Feel
Analytic Dissection
Audience Standard
