期刊文献+

单侧及双侧椎弓根螺钉内固定术和常规方法治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效对比观察

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较单侧及双侧椎弓根螺钉内固定术和常规方法治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效。方法:选取我院56例腰椎间盘突出症患者为研究对象,随机分为观察组和对照组,各28例,给予对照组常规方法治疗,观察组则用单侧及双侧椎弓根螺钉内固定术治疗,比较两组的临床疗效。结果:观察组优良率为92.85%,高于对照组的71.43%,两组差异显著,P〈0.05。结论:对腰椎间盘突出症采用单侧及双侧椎弓根螺钉内固定术疗效显著。
作者 廖伟
出处 《中外女性健康研究》 2015年第21期183-183,共1页 Women's Health Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献83

  • 1胥少汀.关于腰椎疾患行融合与内固定的管见[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2005,15(7):394-396. 被引量:36
  • 2Hanley EJ,Spengler DM ,Wiesel S,et al. Controversies in low back pain:the surgical approach [J]. Instr Course Lect, 1994,43:415-423.
  • 3Yone K,Sakou T,Kawauchi Y,et al. Indication of fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients and its significance [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1996,21 (2) :242-248.
  • 4Suk KS ,Lee HM ,Kim NH ,et al. Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar spinal fusion [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2000,25 ( 14 ) : 1843-1847.
  • 5Iguchi T,Kanemura A,Kasahara K,et al. Lumbar instability and clinical symptoms:which is the more critical factor for symptoms: sagittal translation or segment angulation? [J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2004.17(4) ,284-290.
  • 6Suk KS,Lee HM,Kim NH,et al.Unilateral versusbilateral pediele screw fixation in lumbar spinalfusionSPINE,2000.
  • 7Wurgler-Hauri CC,Kalbarczyk A,Wiesli M,et al.Dynamic neu-tralization of the lumbar spine after microsurgical decompression inacquired lumbar spinal stenosis and segmental instabilitySpine (PhilaPa ),2008.
  • 8Chan CW,Peng P.Failed back surgery syndromePain Med,2011.
  • 9Bokov A,Istrelov A,Skorodumov A,et al.An analysis of reasons forfailed back surgery syndrome and partial results after di erent typesof surgical lumbar nerve root decompressionPain Physician,2011.
  • 10Frymoyer JW.The role of spine fusionSPINE,1987.

共引文献60

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部