期刊文献+

颗粒TMR与精粗分饲对不同品种山羊育肥期生产性能的影响 被引量:18

Effects of TMR Pellet Feed and Concentrated Feed with Roughage on Goats Growth Performance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用颗粒全混合日粮(TMR)与精粗分饲两种饲养方式进行山羊育肥试验。结果表明,颗粒TMR饲养波尔山羊与地方马头山羊,平均日增重均达到120 g/只以上,精粗分饲平均日增重为58.5 g/只,颗粒TMR较精粗分饲试验期增重收益高57.8元/只以上,使用颗粒TMR饲养方式优势明显。不同精粗比颗粒TMR对马头山羊和波尔山羊育肥试验结果表明,高精粗比(5∶5)波尔山羊组日增重为(152±21.94)g,料重比为6.24∶1,其日增重显著高于其他各试验组(P〈0.05),试验期增重收益较其他组高24.3~31.6元/只;高精粗比(5∶5)马头山羊组与低精粗比(4∶6)波尔山羊组和马头山羊组之间日增重差异不显著(P〉0.05),增重期收益无明显差异。 Two feeding modes such as total mixed ration (TMR) and conventional concentrated feed with roughage were conducted in two breeds of fattening goats. The results showed that the average daily gain (ADG) of Matou goats and Boer goats by TMR feeding mode were above 120 g,while in conventional concentrated feed with roughage mode were 58.5 g.The profit from weight gain in TMR feeding mode were higher than conventional concentrated feed with roughage by at least 57.8 yuan per goat and presented obvious advantages. The test of TMR with different forage ratio for fattening Matou goats and Boer goats showed that the ADG of Boer goats in high forage ratio (5:5) group was (152±21.94) g which was significantly higher than other groups (P〈5%).And its feed conversion ratio was 6.24:1,its weight gain profit during the test were higher than other groups from 24.3 to 31.6 yuan per goat.It showed no significant difference in ADG and weight gain profits among the other three groups such as Boer goats in low forage ratio(4:6) and Matou goats group in high and low forage ratio (P〉5%).
出处 《湖北农业科学》 2015年第22期5657-5659,共3页 Hubei Agricultural Sciences
基金 动物胚胎工程及分子育种湖北省重点实验室开放课题资助项目(2012ZD209) 湖北省农业科技创新中心资助项目(2011-620-001-003)
关键词 山羊 颗粒TMR 精粗分饲 日增重 料重比 goats TMR pellet feed concentrated feed with roughage ADG feed conversion ratio
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献27

  • 1张吉鹍,卢德勋,刘建新,包赛娜,邹庆华,刘庆华.粗饲料品质评定指数的研究现状及其进展[J].草业科学,2004,21(9):55-61. 被引量:104
  • 2张吉鹍,刘建新.玉米秸秆与苜蓿之间组合效应的综合评定研究[J].饲料博览(技术版),2007(3):5-10. 被引量:18
  • 3张吉鹍.反刍动物秸秆基础日粮补饲苜蓿的组合效应[J].中国奶牛,2007(5):16-19. 被引量:21
  • 4Terry R A,Tilley J M A,Outen G E. Effect of pH on cellulose digestion under in vitro conditions[J].J. Sci. Food Agri. , 1969,20 : 317-320.
  • 5Mould F L,Orskov E R,Mana S O. Associative effects of mixed feeds. I. Effects of type and level of supplementation and the influence of the rumen fluid pH on cellulolysis in vivo and dry matter digestion of various roughages[J]. Anita. Feed Sci. Technol. , 1983 ( 10 ) : 15- 30.
  • 6Mould F L, Orskov E R, Gauld S A. Associated effects of mixed feeds. II. The effect of dietary addition of bicarbonate salts on the voluntary intake and digestibility of diets containing various proportions of hay and barley[J].Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. ,1983(10) :31- 47.
  • 7Herrera F,Ferreiro M H, Elliott R,et al. The effect of molasses supplements on voluntary feed intake, liveweight gain and rumen function in bulls fed basal diets of ensiled sisal pulp[J]. Tropical Anita. Produetion. 1981 (6) : 178-185.
  • 8Encarnacion C, Hughes J M. The rate of degradability of feeds in rumen bags in animals receiving diets with and without molasses[J].Tropical Anim. Pro- duction, 1981 (6) : 362.
  • 9Orskov E R,Hovell F D B. Rumen digestion of hay (measured with dacron bags) by cattle given sugar cane or pangola hay[J]. Tropical Anita. Production, 1978(3) :9-11.
  • 10Juul-Nielson J. Nutritional principles and productive capacity of the Danish Straw-mix system for ruminants [A]. Maximum Livestock Production from Minimum Land [C]. Mymensingh: Bangladesh Agricultural University, 1981: 287-299.

共引文献57

同被引文献119

引证文献18

二级引证文献80

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部