摘要
对处在法律与道德调整领域交叉点上的文明行为进行专门立法,是法律与道德关系这一传统议题的新实践。鉴于法治与德治属于两套独立的治国方略,在文明行为立法中不能将推进道德建设设定为立法目的,否则会步入道德法律化的误区。设区的市进行文明行为立法在现制之下的合法性存有瑕疵,需要全国人大对此作出解释或者制度安排。文明行为立法应当以属于'义务的道德'和'公共事务'的文明行为为限,既有立法的调整范围过于宽泛。既有文明行为立法规范普遍存在法律后果缺失、行为模式表述不明确及多为准用性规范等不足。
The introduction of specific legislation on civilized behavior at the intersection of legal and moral adjustment is a new practice of the traditional issue of the relationship between law and ethics. Since the rule of law and the rule of virtue belong to two sets of independent national managing strategies,we cannot set the promotion of moral construction as a legislative goal in the legislation of civilized behavior. Otherwise,we will enter the misunderstanding of moral legalization. There is a flaw in the legitimacy of the legislation of a city with subordinate districts that conducts civilized behavior under the current system,and it is necessary for the National People’s Congress to make explanations or institutional arrangements. Legislation for civilized behavior should be limited to civilized acts that are "ethical obligations"and "public affairs",and the adjustment scope of the existing legislation is too broad. There are deficiencies in the existing legal norms of civilized behavior, such as the lack of legal consequences, unclear expression of behavior patterns,and quasi-use norms.
出处
《北方法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第3期105-117,共13页
Northern Legal Science
基金
2016年度国家社科基金项目“党内法规制度体系与国家法律法规的调适与衔接研究”(16BDJ035)的阶段性成果
关键词
文明行为
立法
道德
法律
civilized behavior
legislation
morality
law
