摘要
在我国学术期刊评价领域,目前存在的最为突出的问题,就是重视成果数量而轻视成果质量。这在一定程度上造成了学术期刊发表论文质量不高、科研经费产出效率较低以及科研人员职称评定过程中科研成果重量轻质等问题,并且已经产生了较为严重的不良后果。建议:增加量化评价指标的质量指向性;增加关于质量评价的指标,尤其是关于创新性的评价指标;对期刊代表作应该实行同行专家评议;发挥三大文摘的二次评价作用;尽量排除主观因素对于评价指标的影响和干扰。
The most serious problem in the field of journal or paper evaluation system is to focus on quantity indicator,and neglect quality indicator in some degree,which is the reason why the quality of academic achievements and the efficiency of researching output is not very high and the same problem exists in evaluating researchers. Therefore,this paper brings forward some measurements as follows: improving quality indicator of quality index;adding some indicators about quality,especially about innovation; taking experts' comments on papers in the journal; paying attention to the function of secondary evaluation of three digests,such as Xinhua digest,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences and Academic abstracts of Liberal Arts in Colleges and Universities; removing the influence of interference on quantity indicator.
出处
《华南师范大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第5期30-33,190,共4页
Journal of South China Normal University：Social Science Edition
关键词
质量指标
期刊评价体系
同行专家评议
quality indicator
journal / paper evaluated system
experts' comments
