期刊文献+

认知主体与引领大学生思潮的理论场域构建 被引量:2

The Cognitive Subject and Guiding College Students' Ideological Trend of Building Theory in the Field
下载PDF
导出
摘要 用社会主义核心价值体系引领大学生思潮,涉及认知、认同和践行三个关键环节。仅就认知环节而言,大学生在引领过程中表现出三个有重要影响的主体认知特点:认知闭合、理解偏差和群体思维。结合这些特点,要着重做好隐性的社会主义核心价值观教育、大学生思潮引领之中的三种批判以及引领大学生思潮中的"态度改变",为引领大学生思潮构建有效的理论场域。 With socialist core value system leading college students' ideological trend, it involves three key links of cognition recognition and practice. Only in terms of cognitive link, college students in the process of leading showed three important influences on the body of the cognitive characteristics: cognitive closure, understanding deviation and groupthink. Combined with these characteristics, we should emphasize the recessive socialist core values education, college students' ideological trend lead among three kinds of critique and the leading of the college students' "attitude change" in the ideological trend, to lead the college students' ideological trend to build effective field theory.
作者 李亚员
出处 《当代青年研究》 CSSCI 2015年第6期26-31,共6页 Contemporary Youth Research
关键词 社会主义核心价值体系 引领 大学生思潮 认知主体 理论场域 Socialist Core Value System Lead College Students' Ideological Trend Cognitive Subject the Theory of Field
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献44

  • 1王健.政治理论教学的意识形态视野与引领社会思潮[J].广西经济管理干部学院学报,2010,22(2):80-84. 被引量:1
  • 2宋志红,刘书林.引领社会思潮的关键在于高校党委的政治敏感性和政治鉴别力[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010,25(S1):110-115. 被引量:4
  • 3Adrian, F., & Ribchester, T. (1995). Tolerance of ambiguity. Current Psychology, 14, 179 - 190.
  • 4Adomo, T W., Frenkel-Bnmswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sandford, R.N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.
  • 5Budner, S. A. (1962). Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. Journal of Personality, 30, 29 - 50.
  • 6Chiu, C. Y., Morris, M. W., Hong, Y. Y., & Menon, T. (2000). Motivated cultural cognition: The impact of implicit cultural theories on dispositional attribution varies as a function of need for closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 247 - 259.
  • 7de Dreu, C. K. W. (2003). Time pressure and closing of the mind in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91,280 - 295.
  • 8de Dreu, C. K. W., Koole, S. L., & Oldersma, F. L. (1993). On the seizing and freezing of negotiator inferences: Need for cognitive closure moderates the use of heuristics in negotiation. Personality and Soeial Psychology Bulletin, 25, 34 - 362.
  • 9De Grada, E., Kruglanski, A. W., Mannetti, L., & Perro, A. (1999). Motivated cognition and group interaction: Need for closure affects the contents and processes of collective negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 346 - 365.
  • 10Dijksterhuis, A., van Knippenverg, A., Kruglanski, A. W., & Schapter, C. (1996). Motivated social cognition: Need for closure effects on memory and judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 254 - 270.

共引文献49

同被引文献8

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部