期刊文献+

不同手术方式治疗肝胆管结石的临床效果对比研究 被引量:9

The study of clinical curative effect of different surgical procedures on hepatolithiasis treatment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨胆道镜下肝胆管切开取石术与开腹高位胆管切开取石术治疗肝胆管结石的临床效果。方法将125例肝胆管结石患者根据手术方式不同分为两组,观察组76例,对照组49例。对照组采用常规开腹高位胆管切开取石术治疗,观察组采用胆道镜下肝胆管切口取石术治疗,两组患者均行T管引流术,对比两组术后结石残余率、复发率、并发症发生率及治疗效果。结果观察组术后结石残余率、复发率及术后并发症总发生率均低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组治疗优良率为93.42%,高于对照组的81.63%(P<0.05)。结论胆道镜下肝胆管切口取石术治疗肝胆管结石效果显著,可有效降低结石残余率及复发率,且术后并发症少,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To evaluate the curative effect of endoscopic hepaticotomy and percutanesus hepaticotomy in the treatment of hepatolithiasis. Methods One hundred and twenty five patients with hepatolithiasis in our hospital were divided into two groups according to surgical methods. Patients in the control group were given percutanesus hepaticotomy treatment while those in the observation group were treated with endoscopic hepaticotomy. The rate of residual stones,calculus recurrence rate,complications and curative effects were compared. Results Rate of residual stones,recurrence and complication rate after operation in the observation group were lower than those of the control group( P〈0. 05). The excellent and good rates in the observation group reached93. 42%,higher than 81. 63% in the control group( P〈0. 05). Conclusion Endoscopic hepaticotomy in the treatment of hepatolithiasis has significant clinical efficacy with lower recurrence rate of residual stones and complication rate and is clinically worthy.
出处 《白求恩医学杂志》 2015年第6期582-584,共3页 Journal of Bethune Medical Science
关键词 肝胆管结石 肝胆管切开取石术 胆道镜 开腹高位胆管切开取石术 Hepatolithiasis Hepaticotomy Endoscopic Percutanesus
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献46

  • 1刘夕强,黄厚秋.肝内胆管结石的外科治疗[J].中国普通外科杂志,2006,15(3):221-223. 被引量:17
  • 2王上忠,张培军,陈剑,俞凯华.肝内胆管结石合并肝门部胆管狭窄的手术处理分析[J].东南国防医药,2006,8(5):350-352. 被引量:11
  • 3陈积圣.肝胆管结石的微创治疗的进展[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(2):93-94. 被引量:59
  • 4Tsui W M, Chan Y K, Wong C T, et al. Hepatolithiasis and the syndrome of recurrent pyogenic cholangitis: clinical,radiologic, and pathologic features[J]. Semin Liver Dis, 2011,31 (1) :33 -48.
  • 5Tsui W M, Lam P W, Lee W K, etal. Primary hepatolithiasis, recurrent pyogenic cholangitis, and oriental cholangiohepatitisz a tale of 3 countries[J]. AdvAnat Pathol,2011,18(4):318- 328.
  • 6Sun D P, Wang W C, Wen K C, et al. Two-port laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with T-tube choledochostomy for management of choledocholithiasis: an initial clinical report[J]. Am Surg,2011,77(4) :422-425.
  • 7Kuroki T, Tajima Y, Tsuneoka N, et al. Placement of a plastic biliary stent tube with primary closure of the common bile duct after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration [J]. H epatogastroenterology , 2010 , 5 7 (10 2 /103 ) :1034-1036.
  • 8Kelly M D. Results of laparoscopic bile duct exploration via choledochotomy[J]. ANZ J Surg,2010,80(10) :694-698.
  • 9邓汉东,李振亚,庄紫燕,等.纤维胆道镜行保胆取石术的临床应用[J] .现代医院,2009,9(z2):66-67.
  • 10Pan Weidong,Xu Erjiao,Fang Heping,et al.Surgical treatment of complicated hepatolithiasis using the ultrasound-guided fiberoptic choledochoscope[J] .Surgical Endoscopy,2011,25(2):497 -502.

共引文献49

同被引文献39

引证文献9

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部